The Great Inversion: From Walled Gardens to Sovereign Protocols in the Age of Agentic AI

Summary

The digital economy is currently undergoing a structural inversion of such magnitude that it threatens to dismantle the foundational business models of the last two decades. For twenty years, the technology sector has been governed by the principles of aggregation theory: centralized platforms aggregate users, monopolize attention through graphical user interfaces (GUIs), and extract value via "land and expand" subscription models or ad-based surveillance. The prevailing question—whether incumbents like GitHub, Facebook, Gmail, and Google Maps are destined to become mere primitives, and whether the future of value creation necessitates a shift to open protocols like Bitcoin, Lightning, and Nostr—identifies the central fault line of this transition.

This report posits that the industry is witnessing the death of software as a passive tool and its resurrection as an active laborer, a shift from "Software as a Service" (SaaS) to "Service as a Software." In this emerging paradigm, the interface—once the primary moat of digital businesses—becomes a liability. Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents, which are rapidly becoming the primary economic actors on the web, view human-centric interfaces as friction. They demand structured data, permissionless access, and instantaneous, high-granularity economic rails.

Legacy platforms, burdened by the high friction of fiat payment networks, identity-based access controls, and walled-garden data policies, are structurally ill-equipped to serve this "machine economy." Consequently, a bifurcated future is emerging. On one side lies the "Agentic Web," powered by neutral, decentralized protocols like Bitcoin (for value transfer) and Nostr (for data and communication), which offer the liquidity and permissionlessness that autonomous agents require. On the other side is a retreat into "Hyper-Vertical Integration," where companies seek to own the entire value chain—hardware, software, and proprietary data—to defend against the commoditizing force of general-purpose AI.

The following analysis exhaustively examines these dynamics, detailing the economic decomposition of the application layer, the technical necessity of the protocol shift, and the strategic imperatives for survival in a post-platform era.

---

Part I: The Decomposition of the Application Layer and the Obsolescence of the Interface

The history of the commercial internet has been defined by the dominance of the application layer. The "app" was the unit of value, the destination for the user, and the container for the business model. However, the rise of agentic AI—autonomous systems capable of perceiving, reasoning, planning, and acting—challenges the axiom that the interface is the product. As agents begin to mediate the interaction between human intent and digital execution, the "application" as a destination is being systematically dismantled, reducing formerly dominant platforms to the status of "headless" infrastructure.

1.1 The Commoditization of the Human Interface

The traditional "land and expand" model of SaaS relies heavily on human users logging into a distinct interface, navigating complex menus, and manually manipulating data.1 This model assumes that the value lies in the workflow provided by the software's design. However, AI agents are decoupling these workflows from their visual interfaces. If an AI agent can understand a user's high-level intent—such as "draft a Q3 marketing plan" or "refactor this codebase"—and execute the task by pulling data from Salesforce, Google Analytics, or GitHub via APIs without the user ever opening those applications, the brand visibility, "stickiness," and user retention mechanisms of the underlying software evaporate.2

In this scenario, platforms like GitHub, Gmail, and Google Maps risk becoming "headless" primitives. They devolve into mere databases or infrastructure layers—utilities accessed by agents rather than destinations visited by humans. The user relationship shifts from the underlying tool (e.g., Google Maps) to the agent orchestrating the task (e.g., a personalized travel planning agent). This unbundling is particularly threatening to the ad-based revenue models of giants like Google and Facebook, whose economics depend entirely on human eyeballs dwelling on their interfaces to consume advertisements.3

Consider the implications for search and discovery. If a shopping agent navigates Amazon or Google Shopping to find the best detergent based on chemical composition and price, effectively bypassing the sponsored slots and rendering the "impression" null, the ad model collapses.4 The "House of Internet," built on the economics of attention and the friction of human browsing, faces a leaky roof that can only be fixed by a transition to transaction-based economics, a shift most incumbents are culturally and financially unprepared to make.

1.2 The "Software is Dead" Thesis: From Tool to Labor

The assertion that "software is dead" is not a proclamation of the end of code, but rather the end of the business model of selling software as a standalone tool. For decades, the dominant model was Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), characterized by the strategy of selling access to a tool that made a human more productive. The scarcity was the software itself and the interface that made it usable.

However, Generative AI has fundamentally altered this equation by driving the marginal cost of code creation toward zero. AI coding assistants and autonomous software engineers have drastically reduced the barriers to creating software.5 What used to take a team of engineers months can now be prototyped in days. This abundance of software supply leads to severe margin compression. When competitors can easily clone features and "slap on some UI," software becomes a commodity.6 The "moat" of having a unique feature set or a slightly better interface is erased when an AI can generate a custom interface or a custom tool on the fly.7

This commoditization gives rise to "Service as a Software" (SaaS 2.0). This represents a transition from selling the means of production to selling the ends of production. In the traditional SaaS model, a customer buys a subscription to a CRM and pays a human employee to operate it. In the Service as a Software model, the AI is the laborer. It does not just provide the field for data entry; it finds the lead, qualifies it, and sends the email.8

Table 1: The Structural Shift from SaaS 1.0 to SaaS 2.0 8

Industry analysis projects that this shift could unlock a USD50 trillion contribution to the global economy over the next two decades, compared to the USD5 trillion contribution of traditional SaaS, by capturing the value of the labor market rather than just the IT budget.9 However, for legacy platforms, this is a quintessential "Innovator's Dilemma." Transitioning from high-margin, predictable seat-based subscriptions to outcome-based pricing requires a fundamental re-architecture of both technology and business models—a feat few incumbents manage successfully.1

1.3 The "Depreciation Bomb" and the CapEx Trap

A critical, often overlooked aspect of this transition is the capital intensity required to support AI-driven software. Unlike traditional SaaS, which runs on relatively cheap CPU cycles and commodity storage, AI requires expensive, energy-hungry GPU compute. This introduces a "Depreciation Bomb" for major tech companies.10

As companies like Google, Microsoft, and Meta invest hundreds of billions in AI servers with short useful lifespans (typically 3-4 years before obsolescence), their depreciation expenses explode. If the revenue from AI services does not scale commensurately—or if competition from open models drives prices down—these companies risk owning the world's most expensive, rapidly depreciating asset base. This structural reality creates a "CapEx Trap" that crushes Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).10

This economic pressure further incentivizes the commoditization of software layers. To justify the massive CapEx, tech giants are forced to integrate vertically—designing their own chips, like Google's Axion and Ironwood—to defend margins.11 The software layer above becomes a battleground where only the most differentiated "outcomes" survive, while the general-purpose "platform" is squeezed between the cost of compute and the commoditization of the interface.

---

Part II: The Agentic Economic Imperative and the Failure of Fiat

If the application layer is decomposing, the question arises: what infrastructure replaces it? The research points strongly toward a new stack built on open protocols that facilitate machine-to-machine (M2M) interaction. This is not merely a philosophical preference for decentralization but a pragmatic economic necessity driven by the limitations of the legacy financial system in an automated world.

2.1 The Friction of Fiat for Autonomous Agents

AI agents operating in a high-frequency, automated economy face an "invisible wall" when attempting to transact using traditional rails like Visa, Mastercard, or SWIFT. The legacy financial system is structurally incompatible with the needs of autonomous software.12

The Identity Barrier (KYC/AML): The global banking system is predicated on "legal personhood." To open a merchant account, receive a payout, or even hold a credit card, an entity must provide government-issued identification, proof of address, and pass strict Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks. AI agents are software instances; they have no passports, no physical addresses, and no legal standing. While "legal wrappers" (like LLCs) can be formed, the friction of creating a bank account for every ephemeral agent or sub-agent is prohibitive.13

The Micropayment Impossibility: AI agents operate in a world of high-frequency, low-value transactions. An agent might need to pay USD0.0005 for a single inference query, USD0.001 to access a specific row in a database, or USD0.01 to bypass a CAPTCHA.

• Credit Card Economics: The business model of credit card networks relies on a fixed transaction fee (typically USD0.30) plus a percentage (around 2.9%). A USD0.01 transaction would cost USD0.31 to process, resulting in a negative margin of over 3,000%.12 This fee structure effectively bans micropayments from the fiat economy.
• Latency Mismatch: AI agents operate in milliseconds. Waiting 2-3 days for a bank transfer or ACH payment to settle creates an unacceptable latency mismatch for real-time decision-making and resource allocation. Agents require finality at the speed of code.14

2.2 The Protocol Solution: Bitcoin and Lightning

In this context, Bitcoin and specifically the Lightning Network emerge not just as "crypto assets" but as the native TCP/IP for value in the agentic economy. The Lightning Network acts as a Layer 2 solution on top of Bitcoin, enabling instant, high-volume transactions with negligible fees.

Permissionless Access: The Lightning Network requires no bank account, no KYC, and no approval from a central authority. An agent can generate a public/private key pair in milliseconds and immediately begin sending and receiving value.15 This aligns perfectly with the ephemeral and autonomous nature of AI agents.

Micropayment Viability: Lightning enables transactions as small as one satoshi (currently a fraction of a cent) with near-zero fees. This capability unlocks entirely new business models for agents, such as paying per second of compute, per byte of storage, or per inference token. It allows for granular, streaming value transfer that was previously impossible.16

The L402 Protocol: The integration of payment and authentication is standardized through protocols like L402 (formerly LSAT). This standard combines the HTTP 402 "Payment Required" status code with Lightning invoices and macaroons (authentication tokens).

1. Request: An agent requests a resource (e.g., GET /api/premium-data).
2. Challenge: The server returns a 402 Payment Required error and a Lightning invoice.
3. Payment: The agent pays the invoice instantly via Lightning.
4. Access: The agent receives a cryptographic token (macaroon) serving as proof of payment and resends the request to access the resource.

This entire loop occurs without human intervention, account signup, or subscription management, enabling a "Pay-per-Request" web where agents can frictionlessly navigate paid resources.18

2.3 Stablecoins and the "Triple Play"

While Bitcoin serves as the pristine settlement rail, the volatility of the asset can be a concern for short-term accounting in the agentic economy. This is where stablecoins (USD-pegged assets like USDT or USDC) are increasingly integrated.

• The "Triple Play": The combination of AI Agents (the economic actors), the Lightning Network (the payment rail), and Stablecoins (the unit of account) creates a comprehensive parallel economy.19
• RGB and Taproot Assets: New protocols allow stablecoins to be issued on top of the Bitcoin/Lightning network. This gives agents the best of both worlds: the stability of the USD and the speed/permissionlessness of Lightning.20
• Adoption Signals: Market data indicates that bots already drive 70% of stablecoin transaction volume, suggesting that the machine economy has already selected its currency and rails.21

---

Part III: The Communication Layer: Nostr and the Sovereign Data Web

If Lightning is the "Visa for Agents," the question remains: what is the "Internet for Agents"? The current internet is fragmented into "Walled Gardens" (Facebook, X/Twitter, LinkedIn) that hoard data in centralized silos. This architecture is suboptimal for agents that need global state, permissionless access, and censorship resistance to function reliably.

3.1 Nostr as the Universal Clipboard

Nostr ("Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays") offers a solution that fits the agentic paradigm perfectly. It is not a platform but a protocol—a set of rules for data transmission that no single entity controls.

Censorship Resistance as Economic Security: In the context of AI, censorship resistance is not just a political feature; it is an economic necessity. If an agent builds its business logic on a centralized API (like Twitter's API), it is subject to "platform risk." The platform can revoke access, change pricing, or ban the agent at any time, effectively killing the business. In Nostr, a user's (or agent's) identity is a cryptographic key pair. Data is signed by this key and stored on multiple independent "relays." If one relay blocks an agent, the agent simply publishes to different relays, and the data remains accessible to the network.22 This guarantees operational continuity for autonomous systems.

Machine-Native Identity: Unlike platforms that increasingly require phone number verification or biometric data (hostile to bots), Nostr identities are free to generate mathematically. This allows for the infinite creation of specialized agents—a "finance agent," a "coding agent," a "negotiation agent"—without administrative friction or cost.15

Programmable Social Graph: Nostr allows agents to build a portable social graph. An agent can follow other agents, interact with them, and build a reputation score that travels with it across the network, rather than being locked in a single app. This enables "Agent-to-Agent" (A2A) coordination where agents can discover each other's services and capabilities in a decentralized marketplace.24

3.2 The Decentralized Code and Knowledge Library

Beyond social networking, Nostr is being repurposed as a decentralized storage layer for AI knowledge. "Notebins" allow agents to save code snippets, prompt templates, and reasoning chains to the Nostr network.25 This creates a global, resilient, and accessible library of knowledge that no single corporation can delete.

For AI engineers, this means an agent can be trained to fetch trusted code snippets from a curated list of Nostr pubkeys. If an LLM produces suboptimal code, the engineer can correct it and save the "right" version to Nostr. The agent then queries this decentralized library for future tasks, creating a "human-in-the-loop" verification system that is censorship-resistant and persistent. This transforms the network into a collaborative, global memory for AI.25

3.3 The Decline of the Ad-Based Web and the "Agentic Schism"

The combination of agents, Lightning, and Nostr creates a "Sovereign Web" that stands in direct opposition to the "Ad-Based Web." In the ad model, users pay with attention. In the agent model, agents pay with micropayments (zaps) for value.15

This shift creates a fundamental conflict—an "Agentic Schism"—between legacy platforms and the new machine economy.

• The Conflict: Platforms like Amazon and Google are currently hostile to agents, using CAPTCHAs, IP bans, and lawsuits (e.g., Amazon v. Perplexity) to block scrapers and automated tools.4 This defensive posture attempts to preserve the old model where human eyeballs are the primary metric.
• The Consequence: Platforms that block agents risk becoming irrelevant "dark matter" to the AI economy. If the primary consumer of content becomes an AI agent (which doesn't buy products from ads but executes purchases directly), the revenue model for free, ad-supported platforms evaporates. The "House of Internet," built on the economics of attention, faces a crisis that can likely only be resolved by a transition to transaction-based economics powered by protocols like Lightning.4

---

Part IV: The Strategic Moats: Vertical Integration and Hardware

In a world where software is commoditized and protocols are open, where does defensible value remain? The research indicates a return to "Vertical Integration"—a strategy famously championed by Steve Jobs and now being adapted for the AI era.

4.1 The Steve Jobs Paradigm: "The Whole Widget"

Steve Jobs believed in controlling the "whole widget"—the seamless integration of hardware, software, and content.26 In the AI era, this philosophy is proving to be the ultimate moat against commoditization.

Latency and Experience: To deliver a truly "magical" AI experience—such as a real-time voice translator or a self-driving car—one needs to control the entire stack. Relying on a third-party API introduces latency and dependency. Controlling the hardware (microphone, sensors), the chip (NPU processing), and the model allows for optimization that a software-only "wrapper" cannot match.

Data Ownership: Hardware sensors capture unique, proprietary data from the physical world. A Tesla car captures video of road edges; a vertically integrated industrial robot captures data on assembly line efficiency. This data feeds the model, which improves the software, which in turn sells more hardware. This "data flywheel" is unbreakable by a competitor who only has access to public web data.27

4.2 Lessons from Failure: Rabbit R1 and Humane

The recent failures of the Rabbit R1 and Humane AI Pin serve as cautionary tales of failed or superficial vertical integration.28

• The "Wrapper" Hardware: These devices were essentially "hardware wrappers" for standard LLMs (like GPT-4 or Perplexity). They did not own the underlying model, nor did they have specialized silicon that provided a unique advantage.
• The "App" Trap: They attempted to replace the smartphone without offering a superior experience or distinct utility. They failed because they were neither better than a phone (software) nor possessed a unique hardware advantage (like a specialized sensor).
• The Lesson: Vertical integration only works if the integration creates new functionality that cannot be achieved by software alone. Merely putting an API in a box is not vertical integration; it is a novelty.

4.3 Vertical AI Sovereigns: The New Platforms

The successful "New Platforms" will be vertical sovereigns that resemble Tesla or Apple more than they resemble Facebook or Salesforce.

• Nvidia: Nvidia is the ultimate vertical sovereign of the AI era. It controls the chips (H100s), the software (CUDA), and is now moving into "AI Factories" and cloud services. It has integrated upstream to secure its moat.31
• Cloudflare: By positioning itself as the "connectivity cloud," Cloudflare monetizes the pipes and security layer that agents must traverse. It is building the "rails" for the agentic web, effectively becoming a vertical integration of the network infrastructure itself.32
• Specialized Robotics: Companies integrating AI into physical robots (e.g., for agriculture, surgery, or industrial staffing) have a defensible moat because the physical world is hard to "copy-paste." The integration of "atoms and bits" creates high barriers to entry.33

---

Part V: The Future of Legacy Platforms: Doomed or Evolving?

The user's query asks if existing platforms are "doomed." The analysis suggests a nuanced but grim outlook for those that refuse to adapt, while highlighting pockets of resilience.

5.1 The Threat to Aggregators (Google, Meta, Amazon)

The "Aggregator" business model is built on three pillars: Search/Discovery (humans looking for things), Ad Monetization (showing humans ads), and Transaction Fees (taxing the interaction). AI Agents disrupt all three.

• Disintermediation: Agents do the searching and the buying. An agent doesn't click ads, and it optimizes for price/value, bypassing the "sponsored" results that generate profit for the aggregator.4
• Margin Compression: Serving AI answers is computationally expensive (CapEx heavy), while serving ten blue links is cheap. Moving to an AI-first model lowers the margins of search giants.10
• Data Starvation: As content creators move to walled gardens or encrypted protocols like Nostr to avoid uncompensated scraping, the aggregators' index loses quality.

To survive, these platforms must pivot from "selling attention" to "selling transactions" or "selling intelligence." However, this cannibalizes their core cash cows, a classic Innovator's Dilemma.

5.2 The Resilience of Consumer Social

It is important to note that while utility software (maps, email, code) is being commoditized, entertainment and social software remains resilient—for now. Platforms like TikTok, WhatsApp, and YouTube continue to grow because they cater to human psychological needs (connection, entertainment, status) that agents do not replace.34

However, even these platforms face the threat of "AI Slop"—a flood of low-quality, bot-generated content that degrades the user experience. As the "Dead Internet Theory" becomes a reality, human users may migrate toward authenticated, "proof-of-personhood" networks or retreat into smaller, private group chats (like WhatsApp/Telegram), further eroding the value of the public, ad-supported square.35

5.3 GitHub: From Repository to Agent Workspace

GitHub represents a platform in transition. Currently, it is the "destination" for code. As AI agents like Devin or Roo Code begin to write and review code autonomously, the human developer's time in the GitHub UI decreases.36 GitHub risks becoming a backend storage primitive. To avoid this, GitHub is aggressively integrating AI (Copilot Workspace) to become the orchestration layer for agents, rather than just the storage layer for code. If successful, it evolves; if not, it becomes a "dumb pipe" for agentic labor.

---

Conclusion: The Great Bifurcation

The evidence overwhelmingly supports the hypothesis that the digital economy is bifurcating. The "middle" of the market—generic SaaS platforms, ad-supported websites, and thin AI wrappers—is the "kill zone."

1. Existing Platforms as Primitives:
   Platforms like Google Maps, Gmail, and arguably GitHub are destined to become primitives—commoditized data and utility layers accessed by agents. Their value as "destinations" for human attention will decline, forcing a shift in business models from "monetizing eyeballs" to "monetizing API calls."
2. The Necessity of Protocols:
   The chance for new platforms is not "doomed," but the definition of a platform has changed. The "Agentic Web" requires infrastructure that is permissionless, low-friction, and censorship-resistant. This makes a major shift to protocols like Bitcoin (for value) and Nostr (for communication) not just a possibility, but a structural necessity. The "friction of fiat" is simply too high for the machine economy to tolerate.
3. The Rise of Sovereign Verticals:
   The only viable defense against this commoditization is "Hyper-Vertical Integration." The winners of the next decade will be "Sovereign Verticals"—companies that own the proprietary data, the specialized models, the workflow integration, and often the physical hardware. These companies will resemble Tesla (owning the car, chip, and brain) more than they resemble the software aggregators of Web2.
   The future belongs to Agents (the laborers), Protocols (the rails), and Sovereign Verticals (the castles). The era of the "General Purpose Software Platform" is ending.

Works cited

1. Software Is Not Dead - Interconnected, accessed January 10, 2026, https://interconnected.blog/software-is-not-dead/
2. The seven powers in the age of AI. - European Internet Ventures, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.europeaninternetventures.com/articles/seven-powers-a
3. In Google vs LLM battle for search dominance, the consumer will win - IMD.org, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.imd.org/ibyimd/artificial-intelligence/battle-for-search-dominance/
4. The Agentic Schism: Amazon, Perplexity, and the Search for a New Internet Protocol | by Prab Singh | VUser | Nov, 2025 | Medium, accessed January 10, 2026, https://medium.com/vuser/the-agentic-schism-amazon-perplexity-and-the-search-for-a-new-internet-protocol-8b598dac4f55
5. Agentic SDLC: The AI-Powered Blueprint Transforming Software Development, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.baytechconsulting.com/blog/agentic-sdlc-ai-software-blueprint
6. SaaS is already dead but no one wants to admit it - Reddit, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1nl2pz3/saas_is_already_dead_but_no_one_wants_to_admit_it/
7. OpenAI just killed half the “AI agent builder” startups, without even trying - Reddit, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/productivity/comments/1o2h2vk/openai_just_killed_half_the_ai_agent_builder/
8. Service-as-a-Software: Scale Services Like Software with AI - Martech Tribe, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.martechtribe.com/blog/service-as-a-software-scale-services-like-software-with-ai
9. Is SaaS on its way out? Why “Service as a Software” could shape ..., accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.siroccogroup.com/is-saas-on-its-way-out-why-service-as-a-software-could-shape-the-future/
10. Research details - fyva.ai, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.fyva.ai/research-details?recordId=recr7eMmRUXh6tR6V
11. Vertical Integration: Google's AI Compute Edge? - HyperFRAME Research, accessed January 10, 2026, https://hyperframeresearch.com/2025/11/10/vertical-integration-googles-ai-compute-edge/
12. AI Wants to Shop For You — But Your Credit Card Won't Let It. Here's Why. | by Mahesh Lambe | Medium, accessed January 10, 2026, https://medium.com/@maheshlambe/ai-wants-to-shop-for-you-but-your-credit-card-wont-let-it-here-s-why-7b9c0ea665cb
13. The AI Agent Economy: Why Crypto is Native to M2M Payments - DcentraLab, accessed January 10, 2026, https://dcentralab.com/blog/the-ai-agent-economy-machine-to-machine-m2m-payments
14. Who will become the "VISA" of the AI economy? An adventure about the future payment revolution | Bitget News, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604490306
15. ai - Hivemind Ventures, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.hivemind.vc/ai
16. Unleash AI-Powered Bitcoin Payments: A Deep Dive into the ZBD Lightning Network MCP Server - Skywork.ai, accessed January 10, 2026, https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/ai-bitcoin-payments-zbd-lightning/1981573861236338688
17. AI × Bitcoin × Stablecoins: The Silent Revolution of Value Flow | by AIsa - Medium, accessed January 10, 2026, https://medium.com/@aisa.ai/ai-bitcoin-stablecoins-the-silent-revolution-of-value-flow-57449c3e4574
18. Towards Multi-Agent Economies: Enhancing the A2A Protocol with Ledger-Anchored Identities and x402 Micropayments for AI Agents - arXiv, accessed January 10, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2507.19550v1
19. “AI + Lightning Network + Stablecoin” Triple Play: Opening a New Era of Comprehensive BTC Ecosystem Payment Implementation - Waterdrip Capital, accessed January 10, 2026, https://waterdripcapital.medium.com/ai-lightning-network-stablecoin-triple-play-opening-a-new-era-of-comprehensive-btc-e99c212444e0
20. Unlocking Bitcoin's AI Future: A Deep Dive into the RGB Lightning Node MCP Server - Skywork.ai, accessed January 10, 2026, https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/bitcoin-ai-future-rgb-node/1981912813052989440
21. Stablecoins and AI Agents: Driving a USD140B Decentralized Payment Revolution - OpenExO, accessed January 10, 2026, https://openexo.com/l/5171e09b
22. FEDSTR: Money-In AI-Out A Decentralized Marketplace for Federated Learning and LLM Training on the NOSTR Protocol [Proof-of-Concept — Code: https://github.com/ConstantinosNikolakakis/Fedstr] - arXiv, accessed January 10, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2404.15834v2
23. Nostr - Peter's Mind Vault, accessed January 10, 2026, https://notes.peterpeerdeman.nl/nostr
24. The Ultimate Guide to Austin Kelsay's Nostr MCP Server - Skywork.ai, accessed January 10, 2026, https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/austin-kelsay-nostr-mcp-server/1981234150792679424
25. Unlocking Decentralized Code for AI: A Deep Dive into NODE-TEC's Nostr Code Snippets MCP Server - Skywork.ai, accessed January 10, 2026, https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/unlocking-decentralized-ai-node-tec-nostr/1979006767736672256
26. What Did Steve Jobs Do For Computer Science? - Communications of the ACM, accessed January 10, 2026, https://cacm.acm.org/news/what-did-steve-jobs-do-for-computer-science/
27. Tesla's Vertical Integration Is the Real Competitive Moat | by Aaron Smet | Jan, 2026, accessed January 10, 2026, https://aaronsmet.medium.com/teslas-vertical-integration-is-the-real-competitive-moat-416bdf1f8ff8
28. The First Batch of AI Hardware Has Already Met Its Demise - 36氪, accessed January 10, 2026, https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3380081710655237
29. Jony Ive and OpenAI's secret AI device: Questions and answers on ambition, reality, and prospects - Xpert.Digital, accessed January 10, 2026, https://xpert.digital/en/openais-ki-geraet/
30. What's next for Rabbit? Employees say they haven't been paid for months while company teases new AI hardware | Tom's Guide, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/whats-next-for-rabbit-employees-say-they-havent-been-paid-for-months-while-company-teases-ai-hardware
31. Why Nvidia's USD2 B Synopsys Stake Signals a New Phase in AI Infrastructure Control, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.vntr.vc/media/why-nvidias-2b-synopsys-stake-signals-a-new-phase-in-ai-infrastructure-control?utm_source=sendgrid&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news-dec7
32. Cloudflare: The Indispensable Fabric of the AI-Powered Inter ..., accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.moomoo.com/community/feed/cloudflare-the-indispensable-fabric-of-the-ai-powered-internet-115835741339654
33. Why Vertical Integration is the Only True Defensibility in AI - VC Cafe, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.vccafe.com/2025/10/29/why-vertical-integration-is-the-only-true-defensibility-in-ai/
34. Biggest Social Media Platforms and Apps in 2025 - Dreamgrow, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.dreamgrow.com/top-15-most-popular-social-networking-sites/
35. ad spend - Reports, Statistics & Marketing Trends - eMarketer, accessed January 10, 2026, https://www.emarketer.com/topics/category/ad%20spend
36. Coding Agents: IDEs & Plugins | Machine Learning Podcast - OCDevel, accessed January 10, 2026, https://ocdevel.com/mlg/mla-22