Future of your Banking app: Digital Credit, Stablecoins, and Banking Nirvana

Summary

The global financial architecture is currently navigating a period of profound structural disintermediation, characterized by the migration of value from legacy settlement rails to cryptographically secured, programmable ledgers. This report postulates that the convergence of two distinct but complementary financial innovations—Stablecoins (as a high-velocity transactional layer) and Bitcoin-backed Digital Credit (as a high-yield, tax-efficient savings layer)—creates the necessary conditions for a new paradigm in consumer finance, herein referred to as "Banking Nirvana."

Current retail banking models are predicated on a bifurcated capital structure that serves the institution rather than the depositor: "Lazy Capital" held in checking accounts earns negligible yield due to antiquated clearing mechanisms, while "Ineffective Capital" held in savings accounts suffers from negative real returns after accounting for inflation and immediate taxation. The "Nirvana" architecture resolves this inefficiency by replacing the checking account with a stablecoin wallet (Tier 1) for 24/7/365 settlement and replacing the savings account with perpetual preferred equity instruments (Tier 2) that generate double-digit yields protected by Return of Capital (ROC) tax treatment.

This analysis documents the technical feasibility, regulatory pathways—specifically the GENIUS Act of 2025 and the CLARITY Act of 2026—and economic sustainability of this hybrid model. We examine the mechanics of the "Liquidity Bridge," the automated sweeping of funds between T+1 settled securities and instant stablecoin rails, and the emerging asset class of Digital Credit exemplified by issuers like Strategy Inc. (NASDAQ: STRC) and Strive (NASDAQ: SATA). With major payment networks like Visa and Mastercard integrating stablecoin settlement and fintechs vertically integrating brokerage and banking features, the first entity to seamlessly abstract this complexity will unlock a trillion-dollar migration of consumer capital.

1. The Macro-Structural Failure of Legacy Banking

The modern consumer banking experience is an anachronism, relying on a technological foundation laid in the mid-20th century. While user interfaces have migrated to mobile devices, the underlying "rails" of finance—ACH (Automated Clearing House) and SWIFT—operate on batch-processing architectures designed in the 1970s. This legacy infrastructure forces a distinct tradeoff between liquidity (access to money) and yield (growth of money), resulting in a suboptimal classification of consumer capital into two silos: Lazy Capital and Ineffective Capital.

1.1 The Liquidity Trap: The Economics of Lazy Capital

The checking account serves as the primary interface for consumer liquidity. In the legacy model, this account acts as a holding pen for "Lazy Capital"—funds that sit idle, earning effectively zero interest, waiting to be deployed for liabilities. The economic inefficiency of this capital is driven by the structural limitations of the settlement layer.

Settlement Latency and Friction The core friction in the legacy system is the concept of the "business day." Financial networks based on COBOL mainframes and batch processing—specifically the ACH network in the United States—shut down during weekends and holidays. This latency creates a need for "pre-funding." Consumers must keep excess cash in non-interest-bearing checking accounts to ensure funds are available for expenses that may clear unpredictably over a 1-3 day window.¹

Furthermore, the friction costs of moving this capital are non-trivial. International transfers via SWIFT incur significant fees and foreign exchange (FX) markups, often ranging from 1% to 3% of the transaction value.² This system effectively taxes the velocity of money, discouraging efficient capital allocation.

Data Silos and Lack of Interoperability

Beyond latency, legacy capital is trapped in proprietary bank ledgers. Money in a Chase checking account does not natively "speak" to a brokerage account at Robinhood or a wallet at Coinbase. Moving value between these silos requires intermediary layers (like Plaid or Yodlee) or manual transfers, further slowing velocity. This lack of native interoperability prevents the automation of wealth management, leaving vast sums of consumer capital unoptimized.

1.2 The Yield Trap: The Erosion of Ineffective Capital

The traditional savings account represents "Ineffective Capital." In this model, the consumer acts as an unsecured creditor to the bank, lending their deposits to the institution. The bank, operating on a fractional reserve basis, lends these funds out at interest rates ranging from 7% (mortgages) to 25% (credit cards). In return, the depositor receives a fraction of that value, typically 0.01% to 0.50% in standard accounts, or up to 4.5% in High-Yield Savings Accounts (HYSAs) during high-interest rate environments.

The Tax Drag on Real Returns

The critical flaw in the HYSA model is not just the nominal yield, but the tax treatment. Interest income generated from bank deposits is taxed annually as Ordinary Income. For a mass-affluent professional in a high-tax jurisdiction (e.g., California or New York), the marginal tax rate on this interest can exceed 45% (Federal + State).

Consider the mathematics of a "High Yield" account paying 5.0%:

• Nominal Yield: 5.00%
• Tax Liability (37% Fed + State): -2.00%
• Net Yield: 3.00%
• Inflation (CPI): -3.00%
• Real Return: 0.00%

In real terms, traditional savings vehicles function merely as wealth preservation tools at best, and wealth erosion mechanisms at worst.³ The consumer is taking on counterparty risk (the bank) for zero real economic gain.

1.3 The Nirvana Architecture

The "Banking Nirvana" model proposes a fundamental restructuring of this capital stack. It rejects the Checking/Savings dichotomy in favor of a Tier 1 / Tier 2 architecture (Table 1).

Table 1: The Legacy vs. Nirvana Banking Architecture

By combining these two tiers via an automated interface, the Nirvana app allows the user to maintain minimal working capital in Tier 1 while maximizing the allocation to the high-yield, tax-efficient Tier 2.

2. Tier 1 Architecture: The Stablecoin Settlement Layer

In the Nirvana architecture, the "Checking Account" is functionally replaced by a digital wallet holding stablecoins pegged to the user's local currency. This layer prioritizes Velocity, Availability, and Interoperability, effectively serving as a high-speed rail for value transfer rather than a storage medium.

2.1 The Mechanics of Digital Cash

Stablecoins represent a cryptographic evolution of fiat currency. They maintain a 1:1 peg with the sovereign currency (e.g., USD) but exist on public blockchains (such as Solana, Ethereum, or Base) rather than private bank ledgers.⁴ This shift in infrastructure imparts specific "superpowers" to the capital held in Tier 1.

Velocity: Atomic Settlement Unlike the batch-processing of ACH, stablecoin transactions on high-performance blockchains reach finality in seconds. On the Solana network, for instance, block times are approximately 400 milliseconds. This "Atomic Settlement" capability allows for the concept of streaming money, where income can be received and expenses paid in real-time, eliminating the need for the "float" that banks traditionally profit from.⁵

Availability: The Always-On Network The blockchain network never closes. It operates 24/7/365, irrespective of banking holidays or time zones. This availability is critical for a globalized economy, allowing a user in New York to settle a payment with a vendor in Singapore on a Sunday instantly. This removes the "weekend risk" where liquidity is trapped in the banking system until markets reopen.⁶

Interoperability and Composability A stablecoin wallet is inherently interoperable. Money is not trapped in a siloed database; it is a digital bearer asset that can move freely between applications, wallets, and jurisdictions without requiring permission from a central intermediary. This allows the Nirvana app to integrate with a vast ecosystem of third-party DeFi applications, payment processors, and global merchants.²

2.2 Integration with Legacy Payment Rails (Visa/Mastercard)

For the Nirvana app to function in the current transitionary period, it must bridge the gap between blockchain rails and the existing merchant network. Visa and Mastercard have aggressively moved to integrate stablecoin settlement, effectively legitimizing Tier 1 as a valid "checking" vehicle.

The Solana Settlement Pilot In late 2025, Visa announced the expansion of its stablecoin settlement capabilities to the Solana blockchain.¹ This development allows issuer and acquirer partners to settle transaction obligations directly in USDC.

• The Problem Solved: Previously, a crypto-linked card issuer had to convert digital assets to fiat, wire the fiat to a settlement bank, and wait for clearance. This required the issuer to hold significant pre-funding capital in low-yield fiat accounts to cover transaction volume during banking downtimes (weekends/holidays).
• The Solution: With USDC settlement, the issuer can send stablecoins directly to Visa's treasury wallet. This reduces the settlement cycle and pre-funding requirement from days to seconds.
• Economic Impact: Early pilots with Crypto.com demonstrated that this mechanism reduced payment pre-funding latency from eight days to four days and cut FX fees by 20-30 basis points.² These cost savings can be passed to the user, making the stablecoin checking account economically superior to traditional banking.

Mastercard's Global Reach Similarly, Mastercard has deepened its partnership with Circle to enable USDC and EURC settlement for acquirers in the EEMEA region.⁷ This confirms that the transition to stablecoin settlement is a global phenomenon, not limited to the US market.

2.3 The Regulatory Framework: The GENIUS Act

The viability of Tier 1 relies heavily on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), enacted in July 2025.⁸ This legislation provides the necessary legal certainty for fintechs to build banking products on top of stablecoin rails.

Permitted Issuers and Federal Standards The GENIUS Act ends the era of regulatory ambiguity by defining "permitted payment stablecoin issuers." It allows both insured depository institution subsidiaries and non-bank qualified issuers to mint stablecoins, provided they adhere to strict 1:1 reserve requirements (cash and short-term treasuries).⁹ This fosters a competitive market for stablecoin issuance, ensuring that the "rails" remain low-cost and neutral.

Bankruptcy Remoteness (Section 11(d)) Perhaps the most critical provision for consumer protection is Section 11(d), which amends the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This section grants stablecoin holders a "super priority" claim in the event of an issuer's insolvency.⁸

• The Implication: If a stablecoin issuer fails, the holders of the coin have a legal claim to the reserve assets that takes precedence over the issuer's equity holders, debt holders, and even administrative expenses.
• Safety Profile: This legal structure arguably makes a compliant stablecoin wallet safer than an uninsured bank deposit (amounts over USD 250,000), as the assets are fully reserved and ring-fenced from the issuer's balance sheet risk.

The "No Yield" Mandate The GENIUS Act generally prohibits issuers from paying interest on payment stablecoins.⁸ While this may seem like a drawback, it is a crucial design feature for the Nirvana model. It reinforces the separation of duties: Tier 1 (Stablecoins) is for velocity and safety, not yield. This regulatory constraint forces the ecosystem to develop Tier 2 (Digital Credit) as the dedicated yield-bearing engine.

3. Tier 2 Architecture: The Digital Credit Asset Class

If Tier 1 is the engine of speed, Tier 2 is the engine of wealth. The Nirvana model rejects the traditional savings account in favor of Digital Credit—specifically, perpetual preferred equity instruments issued by Bitcoin Treasury Companies (BTC-TCs).

3.1 Defining the Asset Class

Digital Credit instruments, exemplified by STRC (Strategy Inc. Preferred) and SATA (Strive Preferred), are hybrid securities designed to strip away the volatility of Bitcoin while retaining its wealth-generating properties. These are SEC-registered securities trading on Nasdaq, not cryptocurrencies, which simplifies custody for the fintech provider.

Structural Mechanics

• Instrument Type: Variable Rate Perpetual Preferred Stock.
• Par Value: Typically USD 100 per share.
• Yield Generation: The issuer uses the capital raised to acquire Bitcoin. The yield paid to investors is derived from the issuer's corporate strategy, often referred to as the "Bitcoin Yield" flywheel, where the company issues equity/debt to buy BTC, increasing the Bitcoin-per-share metric.⁶
• Thermostatic Dividend Control: The defining feature of these instruments is the variable dividend rate. If the trading price of STRC drifts below its USD 100 par value, the dividend rate automatically increases to attract buyers and push the price back up. Conversely, if it trades above par, the rate decreases. This mechanism acts as a damper, stripping away the volatility of the underlying Bitcoin asset and creating a stable, fixed-income-like experience.¹⁰

3.2 Market Leaders and Yield Analysis

As of early 2026, the market for Digital Credit has matured, with two dominant issuers establishing the standard.

Strategy Inc. (NASDAQ: STRC)

• Yield: 11.25% annualized (paid monthly).⁶
• Scale: $3.4billionaggregatestatedamountoutstanding.\ast \ast \ast Treasury:\ast \ast Backedbyamassivecorporatetreasuryof713,502Bitcoin.{[}^6]\ast \ast \ast Performance:\ast \ast Haspaid$413 million in cumulative distributions to date.⁶

Strive (NASDAQ: SATA)

• Yield: 12.25% annualized (paid monthly).¹¹
• Treasury: Smaller but growing treasury of 7,525 Bitcoin.¹¹
• Strategy: Explicitly markets the "Bitcoin amplification" toggle, using the preferred stock issuance to accrete value for common shareholders while providing yield to preferred holders.¹²

3.3 The USD Reserve: Mitigating Bear Market Risk

A central critique of the Bitcoin Treasury model is its sustainability during a "Crypto Winter." If the price of Bitcoin collapses, how does the company sustain dividend payments?

The Strategy Inc. Fortress To address this systemic risk, Strategy Inc. established a USD 2.25 Billion Reserve in early 2026.⁶

• Purpose: This cash reserve is ring-fenced specifically to fund dividend payments on STRC and interest on corporate debt.
• Coverage Ratio: The reserve provides approximately 2.5 years of dividend coverage.
• Strategic Implication: This reserve transforms Digital Credit from a speculative bet into a resilient financial instrument. Even if capital markets freeze and the company cannot raise new funds for 30 months, the yield to Tier 2 savers is secure. This "moat" allows the asset to maintain its par value even during periods of extreme Bitcoin volatility.¹³

4. The Fiscal Engine: Return of Capital (ROC) & Tax Alpha

The "Nirvana" aspect of the savings tier is driven not just by the high nominal yield, but by the tax efficiency engineered into the asset class. This efficiency relies on the corporate tax concept of Earnings and Profits (E&P).

4.1 The Mechanism of Return of Capital

Under U.S. tax law, a distribution from a corporation to its shareholders is treated as a taxable dividend only to the extent of the corporation's current or accumulated Earnings and Profits (E&P). If a distribution exceeds E&P, it is treated as a non-taxable Return of Capital (ROC).¹⁴

The Bitcoin Treasury Loophole

Bitcoin Treasury Companies like Strategy Inc. and Strive operate with a unique financial profile. They aggressively reinvest capital into Bitcoin and often incur significant paper losses from depreciation, amortization, and operating expenses relative to their taxable income.

• No E&P: As a result, these companies frequently report zero accumulated E&P. Strategy Inc. has publicly stated its expectation that distributions will remain classified as ROC for the "foreseeable future," defined as ten years or more.⁶
• IRS Form 8937: This tax treatment is formalized annually through the filing of IRS Form 8937, which instructs shareholders on how to adjust their cost basis.¹⁵

4.2 The Economics of Tax Deferral

The classification of dividends as ROC fundamentally alters the compounding math for the saver.

• Immediate Impact: An ROC distribution is not taxed in the year it is received. The investor receives the full cash flow (e.g., USD 12 on a USD 100 investment).
• Basis Reduction: Instead of creating a tax liability, the distribution reduces the investor's "cost basis" in the asset.
  • Example: An investor buys STRC at USD 100. They receive USD 12 in annual dividends. Their taxable income is USD 0. Their new cost basis is USD 88.
• Deferred Liability: Taxes are only owed when the asset is eventually sold.
  • Scenario: After 5 years, the investor sells the stock for USD 100. They have received USD 60 in tax-free cash flow. Their basis is USD 40. They realize a capital gain of USD 60 (USD 100 sale - USD 40 basis).
• Rate Arbitrage: This future gain is taxed at the Long-Term Capital Gains rate (0%, 15%, or 20%), which is significantly lower than the Ordinary Income rates (up to 37%+) applied to traditional savings account interest.¹⁶

4.3 Quantitative Comparison: HYSA vs. Digital Credit

Table 2: 10-Year Growth of USD 100,000 Savings

Assumptions: HYSA Yield = 5%, Tax Rate = 40% (Fed+State). Digital Credit Yield = 12%, ROC Treatment, Capital Gains Tax = 20% at end of period.

Analysis: Even after paying the deferred capital gains tax at the end of Year 10, the Digital Credit saver ends up with double the wealth of the HYSA saver. This massive discrepancy is the "Tax Alpha" that makes the Nirvana model superior to any traditional banking product.

5. The Liquidity Bridge: Engineering the "Nirvana" Interface

The technical challenge of the Nirvana App is to mask the complexity of these two tiers. The user should not have to manually manage "buying stocks" or "selling crypto." The interface must present a seamless experience where funds are automatically optimized. This requires the construction of a Liquidity Bridge—middleware that manages the automated sweeping of funds.

5.1 The Automated Sweep Architecture

The core logic of the app relies on a "Smart Sweep" algorithm.

User Journey: The Income Event

1. Ingress: The user receives a USD 5,000 salary payment via Direct Deposit.
2. Conversion: The partner bank or fintech instantly converts this fiat deposit into USDC (Tier 1).
3. Logic Layer: The user has set a rule: "Maintain USD 2,000 in Checking." The app identifies USD 3,000 in excess liquidity.
4. Sweep Execution: The app triggers an API call to a partner brokerage (e.g., DriveWealth, Alpaca). It executes a Market Buy Order for USD 3,000 of STRC/SATA.
5. Custody: The securities are purchased in the user's name but displayed in the "Savings" tab of the app.

5.2 Solving the T+1 Settlement Mismatch

A critical friction point exists: Tier 1 (Stablecoins) settles instantly, but Tier 2 (Securities) operates on a T+1 settlement cycle (trade date + 1 business day) in U.S. markets.¹⁷ If a user needs to spend their savings instantly (e.g., for an emergency expense), the app cannot wait 24 hours for the STRC sale to settle.

Two architectural models resolve this latency:

Model A: The Securities-Based Line of Credit (SBLOC)

The fintech acts as a lender of last resort for micro-transactions.

• Trigger: User attempts a USD 500 transaction. Tier 1 balance is USD 0. Tier 2 balance is USD 10,000.
• Action: The app instantly approves a micro-loan for USD 500, collateralized by the USD 10,000 in STRC (5% LTV).
• Repayment: When the STRC trade settles the next day (T+1), the cash proceeds automatically repay the loan.
• Viability: Major brokerages already offer SBLOCs, but they are typically manual products for high-net-worth clients. The Nirvana App automates this via API for retail users.¹⁸

Model B: The Fintech Float

The fintech uses its own corporate balance sheet to "front" the settlement.

• Action: The fintech pays the merchant immediately from its own stablecoin pool.
• Reimbursement: It executes the user's sell order. When the trade settles, the funds replenish the corporate pool.
• Capital Efficiency: With the move to T+1 settlement in 2024, the capital requirements for maintaining this float have been significantly reduced, making it economically feasible for fintechs to offer this service at scale.¹⁹

5.3 Technical Stack and API Integration

Building this bridge requires deep integration between crypto wallets and traditional brokerage infrastructure.

Programmable Wallets Infrastructure providers like Circle offer Programmable Wallets that allow developers to abstract away the complexity of blockchain interactions. These wallets can be controlled via standard REST APIs, allowing the app to manage gas fees and transaction signing in the background.²⁰

Brokerage-as-a-Service APIs To handle the Tier 2 side, the app would integrate with platforms like DriveWealth or Alpaca. These providers offer fractional trading APIs, allowing the app to execute dollar-based orders (e.g., "Buy USD 15.50 of STRC") rather than share-based orders. This is essential for the smooth operation of the sweep mechanism.²¹

6. Regulatory Feasibility: The Dual-Track Compliance Model

The regulatory landscape for digital assets has shifted dramatically in the 2025-2026 period, moving from ambiguity to a structured dual-track regime. The Nirvana App must navigate two distinct frameworks: Banking/Payments and Securities.

6.1 The CLARITY Act: Ending the Turf War

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) establishes a "bright line" between the jurisdiction of the SEC and the CFTC.²²

• Digital Asset Securities: The Act confirms that assets like STRC (equity instruments) remain under SEC jurisdiction.
• Hybrid Accounts: Crucially, the Act explicitly allows intermediaries to offer accounts that hold both commodities (digital assets) and securities, provided they adhere to Customer Protection Rules. This creates the legal container for the Nirvana App's hybrid wallet.²³
• Broker-Dealer Compliance: Recent SEC guidance has eased the custody requirements for digital asset securities, allowing broker-dealers to more easily facilitate the custody of these assets without running afoul of the "physical possession" rules of Rule 15c3-3.²³

6.2 Regulatory Licensing Strategy

The Nirvana App does not necessarily need to be a chartered bank. It can operate as a Hybrid Fintech:

1. Money Services Business (MSB): To handle the Tier 1 stablecoin flows. This requires registration with FinCEN and state-level Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs). The GENIUS Act may eventually offer a federal "payment stablecoin issuer" charter, simplifying this.⁹
2. Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) / Broker-Dealer (BD): To handle the Tier 2 Digital Credit. The app would likely partner with an Introducing Broker (IB) to handle trade execution and custody, thereby offloading the heavy regulatory lift of direct clearing.²⁴

The "Super Priority" Marketing Advantage The GENIUS Act's Section 11(d) provides a massive marketing advantage. The app can truthfully claim that funds held in Tier 1 are protected by federal bankruptcy priority rules. This addresses the lingering "FTX fear" in the retail market and positions the stablecoin wallet as a legally robust checking alternative.⁸

7. Market Dynamics: The Race for the Trillion-Dollar Interface

The components for Banking Nirvana are available today. The market opportunity lies in the interface—the entity that integrates these disparate rails into a cohesive user experience.

7.1 The Competitive Landscape

The Disruptors: Robinhood and Cash App

• Robinhood: Already possesses the brokerage license and a massive user base. Their "Gold" subscription model (offering 5% yield) is a precursor to Tier 2. Robinhood is uniquely positioned to integrate a "Gold Savings" tier powered by STRC/SATA. However, they currently lack a seamless, stablecoin-native spending rail, relying instead on traditional cash sweeps.²⁵
• Coinbase: Has perfected the Tier 1 rail with USDC and Base. Their debit card allows for crypto spending. However, their interface is optimized for trading, not banking. They lack a seamless, native integration for securities like STRC. Their path to Nirvana likely involves tokenization—listing a "Wrapped STRC" token that trades 24/7 on-chain, bypassing the legacy brokerage rail entirely.²⁶

The Incumbents: Chase and Wells Fargo

• The Dilemma: Traditional banks face the classic Innovator's Dilemma. They currently earn billions from the spread on "Lazy Capital" (paying 0.01% on deposits while lending at 7%). Launching a 12% yield product would cannibalize their own cheap funding source.
• The Threat: As a result, banks will likely be the last to adopt this model. They face a "hollowing out" risk where deposits migrate en masse to fintechs offering the Nirvana stack, forcing them to eventually adopt similar crypto-backend rails to survive.²⁷

7.2 Economic Sustainability and Risks

While the model offers a compelling consumer value proposition, it is not without risks.

Bitcoin Bear Market Risk The yield on STRC/SATA is structurally linked to the issuer's ability to raise capital to buy Bitcoin. If the issuer's stock trades below the value of its Bitcoin holdings (NAV), the "flywheel" of issuing accretive equity slows down. This occurred briefly for Strategy Inc. in early 2026.²⁸ However, the $2.25 billion USD reserve serves as a critical buffer, ensuring dividend continuity during these periods.¹³

Regulatory Reversal

While the GENIUS and CLARITY Acts provide a framework, future administrations could alter the tax treatment of ROC or the definition of stablecoins. If the IRS were to aggressively recalculate E&P for Bitcoin Treasury companies, the "tax-deferred" status could be challenged retroactively, reducing the "Tax Alpha" of Tier 2.

8. Conclusion: The Inevitable Shift

The "Banking Nirvana" thesis is not a speculative dream; it is an engineering roadmap based on existing, proven financial primitives.

1. Stablecoins solve the Velocity problem (Tier 1).
2. Digital Credit solves the Yield problem (Tier 2).
3. Return of Capital solves the Tax problem (Fiscal Engine).

The barrier to entry is no longer technological; it is purely an interface design challenge. The winner of this race will not be a traditional bank; it will be a software company that successfully hides the complexity of blockchains and securities laws behind a simple, two-tab interface: Spend and Save.

When this product achieves seamless UX, the legacy banking model of 0.01% yields and 3-day transfers will effectively be rendered obsolete. The entity that builds this interface first will unlock a multi-trillion dollar migration of consumer capital, fundamentally re-architecting the boring, everyday utility of money.

Works cited

1. Visa Launches Stablecoin Settlement in the United States, Marking a Breakthrough for Stablecoin Integration, accessed February 9, 2026, https://usa.visa.com/about-visa/newsroom/press-releases.releaseId.21951.html ↩ ↩2

2. Visa Crypto.com USDC Settlements Case Study, accessed February 9, 2026, https://usa.visa.com/content/dam/VCOM/regional/na/us/Solutions/documents/visa-crypto.com-usdc-case-study.pdf ↩ ↩2 ↩3

3. Tax Implications of Cryptocurrency Holdings for Corporations - Capitol Lien, accessed February 9, 2026, https://capitollien.com/tax-implications-of-cryptocurrency-holdings-for-corporations/ ↩

4. Stablecoins payments infrastructure for modern finance | McKinsey, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-stable-door-opens-how-tokenized-cash-enables-next-gen-payments ↩

5. Stablecoins beyond payments: The onchain lending opportunity, accessed February 9, 2026, https://corporate.visa.com/content/dam/VCOM/corporate/solutions/documents/stablecoins-beyond-payments-onchain-lending-opportunity.pdf ↩

6. Strategy Announces Fourth Quarter 2025 Financial Results, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.strategy.com/press/strategy-announces-fourth-quarter-2025-financial-results_02-05-2026 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

7. Mastercard expands partnership with Circle to transform digital settlement for merchants and acquirers in region, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.mastercard.com/news/eemea/en/newsroom/press-releases/en/2025-1/august/mastercard-expands-partnership-with-circle-to-transform-digital-settlement-for-merchants-and-acquirers-in-region ↩

8. The GENIUS Act: A Comprehensive Guide to US Stablecoin ..., accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/crypto-policy-tracker/the-genius-act-a-comprehensive-guide-to-us-stablecoin-regulation ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

9. FDIC Approves Proposal to Establish GENIUS Act Application Procedures for FDIC-Supervised Institutions Seeking to Issue Payment Stablecoins | FDIC.gov, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2025/fdic-approves-proposal-establish-genius-act-application-procedures-fdic ↩ ↩2

10. STRC Information - Strategy, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.strategy.com/stretch ↩

11. Strive Increases SATA Perpetual Preferred Stock Dividend to 12.25% - GlobeNewswire, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/12/15/3205427/0/en/Strive-Increases-SATA-Perpetual-Preferred-Stock-Dividend-to-12-25.html ↩ ↩2

12. Strive, Inc. - Strive Announces Nasdaq Listing of SATA and Closing ..., accessed February 9, 2026, https://investors.strive.com/news-events/news-releases/news-details/2025/Strive-Announces-Nasdaq-Listing-of-SATA-and-Closing-of-Oversubscribed--Upsized-IPO/default.aspx ↩

13. Strategy Inc. 'B-' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable - S&P Global, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3495062 ↩ ↩2

14. Strategy's Distributions to Digital Credit Investors in 2025 are Return of Capital, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260202507335/en/Strategys-Distributions-to-Digital-Credit-Investors-in-2025-are-Return-of-Capital ↩

15. Return of Capital Information - Strategy, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.strategy.com/investor-relations/dividend-return-of-capital ↩

16. Your Crypto Tax Guide - TurboTax - Intuit, accessed February 9, 2026, https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tips/investments-and-taxes/your-cryptocurrency-tax-guide/L4k3xiFjB ↩

17. T+1: Transforming the Trading Lifecycle from End-to-End - Citi, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.citigroup.com/global/insights/t-1-transforming-the-trading-lifecycle-from-end-to-end ↩

18. What Is a Securities-Based Line of Credit? - Charles Schwab, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/what-is-securities-based-lending ↩

19. US Accelerated Settlement to T+1 – - LTIMindtree, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.ltimindtree.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/US-Accelerated-Settlement-to-T1-POV.pdf?pdf=download ↩

20. How to Use Circle API to Trade USDC - Apidog, accessed February 9, 2026, https://apidog.com/blog/circle-api/ ↩

21. Technical Analysis of Robinhood's Platform Architecture and FinTech Innovations | by Jung-Hua Liu | Jan, 2026 | Medium, accessed February 9, 2026, https://medium.com/@gwrx2005/technical-analysis-of-robinhoods-platform-architecture-and-fintech-innovations-a2dbb95fd1ef ↩

22. The Facts: The CLARITY Act | United States Committee on Banking ..., accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/the-facts-the-clarity-act ↩

23. US Crypto Policy Tracker Regulatory Developments, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.lw.com/en/us-crypto-policy-tracker/regulatory-developments ↩ ↩2

24. Regulatory Drivers: The Shift Away from Dual Registration - Oyster Consulting, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.oysterllc.com/what-we-think/blog-dual-registration-does-it-make-sense-to-separate/ ↩

25. Robinhood: The First Financial Institution Built For The Internet Generation - Ark Invest, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.ark-invest.com/articles/analyst-research/robinhood-first-financial-institution-built-for-internet-generation ↩

26. Coinbase vs. Robinhood: Which Should You Choose? - Investopedia, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/coinbase-vs-robinhood-5176293 ↩

27. Top Banking Trends for 2026 | Accenture, accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/accenture-banking-trends-2026 ↩

28. Strategy Bitcoin Bet Hits First Unrealized Loss As Funding Questions ..., accessed February 9, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/software/nasdaq-mstr/strategy/news/strategy-bitcoin-bet-hits-first-unrealized-loss-as-funding-q ↩