The Strategic Anchor: Apple’s Creator Studio and the Restructuring of the Creative Economy in the Age of the Great AI Shakeout

Summary

The year 2026 marks a definitive inflection point in the trajectory of the digital creative economy, a period industry analysts have termed the "Great AI Shakeout." Following the explosive, unrestricted growth of generative artificial intelligence between 2022 and 2025, the market is undergoing a brutal correction. The collapse of the "wrapper" application economy—thin user interfaces built atop commoditized foundation models—has left professional creators navigating a fractured, expensive, and volatile software landscape. In this environment, the traditional economic models of creative software are failing. The "seat-based" licensing models of incumbent giants like Adobe are under siege by the efficiency gains of AI, while the capital requirements for high-end generative tools (such as Mosaic AI and ElevenLabs) are devouring creator budgets. Into this chaotic breach steps Apple Inc. with a strategic maneuver that fundamentally reorders the value chain of content creation: the Apple Creator Studio. By bundling its flagship professional applications—Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage—into a unified subscription priced at a USD 12.99¹, Apple is not merely engaging in a price war. It is establishing a low-cost utility layer for the creative industries. This report argues that Apple’s strategy is a calculated, multi-dimensional response to the AI shakeout, designed to commoditize the "assembly" phase of production while securing the ecosystem lock-in required to drive hardware sales. This analysis posits that Apple’s strategy rests on three pillars. First, the Technical Pillar, which leverages a unified codebase and a hybrid AI architecture (combining on-device Neural Engine processing with a strategic Google Gemini backend integration) to break down the historical silos between video, audio, and image workflows.¹ Second, the Economic Pillar, which explicitly acknowledges the shift in value from "tools of manipulation" (NLEs, DAWs) to "tools of generation" (GenAI). By aggressively lowering the cost of the former, Apple liberates creator budgets to invest in the latter—specifically, high-cost emerging tools like Mosaic AI for visual ideation ² and ElevenLabs for neural voice synthesis.³ Third, the Strategic Pillar, which positions the Apple ecosystem not as a competitor to these generative giants, but as the stable "workbench" upon which their volatile outputs are refined, assembled, and mastered. This report offers an exhaustive examination of these dynamics, providing a detailed breakdown of the technical convergence within the Creator Studio, an economic analysis of the modern creator’s "tech stack," and a strategic forecast for the post-shakeout creative landscape.

Chapter 1: The Macroeconomic Landscape of 2026 – The Great AI Shakeout

To understand the necessity and brilliance of Apple’s Creator Studio, one must first dissect the hostile economic environment in which it was launched. The "Great AI Shakeout" of 2026 is not a sudden crash, but the inevitable result of unsustainable capital dynamics in the generative AI sector colliding with the practical realities of professional workflow.

1.1 The Collapse of the "Wrapper" Economy

The early phase of the generative AI boom (2022–2024) was defined by the proliferation of "wrapper" companies. These startups capitalized on the API accessibility of models like GPT-4, Stable Diffusion, and early iterations of Claude to build niche applications—an app solely for writing marketing copy, another for removing video backgrounds, a third for generating social media captions. These tools charged premium monthly subscriptions, often ranging from USD 10 to USD 30, for functionality that lacked a defensible technological moat. By 2026, the value proposition of these wrappers has evaporated. Foundation model providers (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic) and major platform holders (Apple, Microsoft) have integrated these capabilities directly into their operating systems and core applications. The "Great AI Shakeout" is the market correction where capital flees these mid-tier vendors. For the professional creator, this has resulted in "subscription fatigue" and "stack instability." A creator who previously relied on five different USD 20/month AI tools now finds those tools either defunct, acquired, or rendered redundant by native OS features. However, the need for the functionality remains.

1.2 The Crisis of "Stack Inflation"

While low-value wrappers are dying, high-value generative tools are becoming more expensive. The computational cost of inference—particularly for video generation and high-fidelity voice synthesis—remains high. Companies like Runway and ElevenLabs have moved towards consumption-based pricing models that can quickly escalate for professional users. This has created a crisis of "Stack Inflation." A professional video creator in 2026 faces a daunting ledger of monthly recurring costs: Legacy NLE/DAW Subscription: ~USD 55.00 (e.g., Adobe Creative Cloud). Generative Video Subscription: ~USD 95.00 (e.g., Runway Unlimited).⁴

Utility/Plugin Subscriptions: ~USD 50.00 (e.g., Motion Array, cleanup tools). The total monthly outlay approaches USD 330.00, or nearly USD 4,000 annually. For freelance creators, independent filmmakers, and small agencies—the backbone of the creator economy—this overhead is stifling. The "Shakeout" is not just about startups failing; it is about creators failing to sustain the cost of production in an AI-driven market.

1.3 The Commoditization of the NLE

Simultaneously, the traditional Non-Linear Editing (NLE) system is facing an existential identity crisis. For three decades, the NLE (represented by Avid Media Composer, Premiere Pro, and Final Cut) was the high-margin centerpiece of the post-production industry. Its value was derived from the complexity of its toolset: the precise, manual manipulation of time and assets. However, generative AI is shifting value from manipulation to generation. When an AI model can generate a B-roll sequence, sync it to music, and color grade it in seconds, the manual controls of an NLE become less "premium features" and more "utility maintenance." The NLE is becoming the plumbing of the creative process—essential, but no longer the primary driver of value. Adobe has faced significant headwinds as investors question the longevity of its seat-based pricing model in an era where AI agents might reduce the headcount of human editors.[^8] In this landscape, Apple’s move to bundle its professional apps for USD 12.99 is a recognition of this commoditization. It is a strategic devaluation of the "Old Stack" (the NLE) to accommodate the financial reality of the "New Stack" (Generative AI).

Chapter 2: The Strategic Pivot – The Utility Layer Thesis

Apple’s response to the Great AI Shakeout is the establishment of the Creative Utility Layer. This strategy fundamentally redefines professional software not as a premium service to be monetized for maximum ARPU (Average Revenue Per User), but as a low-cost infrastructural utility designed to support the broader ecosystem.

2.1 Defining the Utility Layer

In economics, a utility is a service that is fundamental to the operation of other services—water, electricity, internet bandwidth. Utilities are characterized by broad accessibility, reliability, and typically, lower unit costs compared to the high-value goods they enable. USD 12.99[^10] This serves two strategic purposes: Churn Reduction: USD 12.99[^10] It becomes a "keep it just in case" subscription, unlike a USD 60/month Adobe plan which is the first to be cancelled during a downturn. Ecosystem Anchorage: By controlling the utility layer—the actual workbench where files are finalized—Apple ensures that regardless of which AI model generates the content, the intellectual property resides on an Apple device, within an Apple file format (FCP library, Logic Project), stored on Apple iCloud servers.

2.2 The "Workbench" Theory

The Utility Layer thesis posits that in the AI era, the creative workflow splits into two distinct phases: The Factory and The Workbench. The Factory (Generative AI): This is where assets are created from raw data. Tools like Mosaic AI and ElevenLabs act as factories, churning out video clips, images, and voice files based on prompts. These factories are expensive to run (high inference costs) and reside in the cloud. The Workbench (Creator Studio): This is where the raw materials from the factory are assembled into a coherent narrative. The workbench requires precision, stability, and real-time interaction. Apple has ceded the "Factory" layer to specialized AI companies (and its partner Google Gemini) because the margins there are volatile and capital-intensive. Instead, it has doubled down on being the best "Workbench" in the world. By integrating features like Montage Maker ¹ and Magnetic Mask ⁵, Apple makes the workbench efficient enough to handle the massive influx of assets from the AI factories.

2.3 Comparative Economics: Apple vs. Adobe

The juxtaposition of Apple’s strategy against Adobe’s highlights the divergent paths of the industry. Adobe’s Dilemma: Adobe is a software-only company. It must monetize its software at a premium to satisfy shareholders. To justify its pricing, it is attempting to build its own "Factory" (Firefly) inside the "Workbench" (Premiere/Photoshop). However, this increases its cost basis (cloud compute) and forces it to maintain high subscription prices.[^9] Apple’s Advantage: Apple is a hardware and ecosystem company. It does not need to make a 90% margin on Final Cut Pro. It monetizes the hardware required to run the software (Mac Studio, iPad Pro) and the storage (iCloud) required to house the assets.⁶ This allows Apple to use Creator Studio as a loss leader (or low-margin utility) to undercut Adobe, knowing that a user locked into Final Cut Pro is a user who will buy a USD 3,000 MacBook Pro every three years.

2.4 The Education Market Strategy

A critical component of the Utility Layer strategy is the aggressive pricing for education (USD 199/year or USD 2.99/month tiers depending on institution).⁷ By making the pro stack effectively free for students, Apple ensures that the next generation of creators treats the Apple ecosystem as the default utility. In the Shakeout era, where schools are struggling to budget for expensive AI credits, a low-cost, all-inclusive creative suite is an irresistible value proposition for educational institutions.

Chapter 3: Technical Architecture and Silo Breaking

The economic strategy of the Utility Layer is enabled by a profound technical reorganization of Apple’s software portfolio. The Creator Studio is not merely a marketing bundle; it represents the culmination of a years-long engineering effort to unify codebases and break down the internal silos between creative disciplines.

3.1 The Unified Codebase: SwiftUI and Metal

The ability to offer Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Pixelmator Pro across Mac and iPad is driven by a unified codebase, likely built on SwiftUI and the Metal graphics API.⁸ This architectural convergence allows Apple to deploy features simultaneously across platforms and form factors. SwiftUI: Facilitates responsive interfaces that adapt from the mouse-and-keyboard precision of the Mac to the touch-and-pencil fluidity of the iPad. Metal: Provides low-level, high-performance access to the GPU, essential for real-time rendering of AI effects like the Magnetic Mask. This unification reduces Apple’s engineering overhead (maintenance of one codebase instead of two) and increases feature velocity. It also allows for the seamless "round-tripping" of projects. A project started in Final Cut Pro for iPad can be air-dropped to a Mac for final grading without any transcoding or file conversion.⁵

3.2 Breaking Internal Silos: Cross-Disciplinary AI

The most significant innovation in Creator Studio is the cross-pollination of AI models between applications. In the traditional siloed model, a video editor (NLE) knows nothing about music, and a music software (DAW) knows nothing about video. Apple has broken this wall.

3.2.1 Audio Intelligence in Video (Logic → Final Cut)

The Beat Detection feature in Final Cut Pro ¹ is a prime example. It utilizes an AI model trained for Logic Pro to analyze the rhythmic structure of audio files placed in the video timeline. Mechanism: The model detects not just transients (loud peaks) but musical meter (downbeats, bars). It visualizes this as a "Beat Grid" in the video editor. Implication: This allows a video editor to perform "rhythmic editing"—cutting clips exactly on the beat—without manual marking. It democratizes a skill (musical timing) that previously required a high degree of expertise.

3.2.2 Visual Intelligence in Compositing (Motion → Final Cut)

The Magnetic Mask ¹ utilizes computer vision models from the Motion team to bring advanced compositing to Final Cut. Mechanism: It uses object segmentation to track subjects frame-by-frame. Implication: This removes the need for a separate "VFX pass" in a tool like After Effects. The editor can isolate a subject, apply a color grade to the background, and apply a different grade to the subject, all within the main NLE timeline.

3.2.3 Image Intelligence in Video (Pixelmator → Final Cut)

The inclusion of Pixelmator Pro ⁹ bridges the gap between static and moving imagery. Mechanism: Pixelmator’s ML Super Resolution allows creators to upscale low-resolution assets (common with AI generated images from Midjourney or DALL-E) before importing them into a 4K video timeline. Implication: This validates the "Hybrid" workflow where generative AI assets are polished in the Apple utility layer before final assembly.

3.3 Hardware Optimization: The Apple Silicon Synergy

The performance of these features is inextricably linked to Apple Silicon. The M-series chips (M1 through M5) contain a dedicated Neural Engine. Latency: Features like Voice Isolation ⁵ run in real-time on playback. There is no "render bar" waiting for the audio to be cleaned; the Neural Engine processes the inference stream instantaneously. Bandwidth: The unified memory architecture (UMA) of Apple Silicon allows the GPU, CPU, and Neural Engine to access the same data pool without copying. This is crucial for 4K and 8K video workflows, where memory bandwidth is often the bottleneck.¹⁰

Chapter 4: The Hybrid AI Engine – On-Device Efficiency and Gemini Integration

Apple’s approach to AI in Creator Studio is distinct from the industry standard. While competitors aggressively push cloud-centric AI (to capture user data and sell subscription credits), Apple employs a Hybrid AI Architecture. This architecture splits workloads between the device and the cloud, optimizing for cost, privacy, and capability.

4.1 On-Device AI: The Economic Engine of the Bundle

The majority of AI features in Creator Studio run entirely on-device. This includes Magnetic Mask, Voice Isolation, Beat Detection, and Montage Maker.¹ The Zero-Marginal Cost Advantage: Because these features run on the user's hardware, they cost Apple nothing to operate after development. This is why Apple can include them in a USD 12.99 bundle. Contrast with Competitors: Compare this to Runway’s Green Screen tool or Adobe’s Firefly Video, which require cloud processing. Every time a user employs these tools, the vendor pays for GPU cycles. To recoup this, they must charge high subscription fees or limit usage with "credits." Apple’s on-device strategy eliminates this variable cost, allowing for unlimited use without "credit anxiety."

4.2 The Google Gemini Partnership: The Cloud Intelligence Layer

While on-device AI handles specific tasks efficiently, it lacks the massive parameter count required for broad "World Knowledge" or high-fidelity generation. To address this, Apple has integrated Google Gemini into the backend of its ecosystem.¹¹

4.2.1 The "White Label" Implementation

Reports suggest that Apple is using a white-label version of Gemini to power features that require deep semantic understanding.¹² Visual Search: In Final Cut Pro, users can search for "a shot of a happy dog at sunset." This requires a multimodal understanding of the video content. The Gemini model provides the semantic indexing capability that allows this natural language query to map to the visual data. Strategic Rationale: By partnering with Google, Apple avoids the multi-billion dollar capital expenditure of training a frontier model from scratch. It essentially "rents" the intelligence for the specific features where it is needed, preserving its capital for hardware R&D and OS development.

4.3 Privacy Architecture: Private Cloud Compute

A critical component of this hybrid model is Private Cloud Compute (PCC).¹¹ Mechanism: When a request requires cloud processing (e.g., a complex Gemini query), the data is sent to an Apple-controlled server cluster running Apple Silicon. The data is processed within a secure enclave that ensures even Apple (and certainly Google) cannot retain or inspect the user’s data. Market Positioning: This privacy architecture is a massive competitive advantage for professional creators. Studios and agencies are increasingly banning the use of public AI tools (like ChatGPT or Midjourney) due to intellectual property risks. Apple’s PCC allows it to market Creator Studio as the "Enterprise-Safe" AI solution, where data privacy is cryptographically guaranteed.

4.4 The "Ajax" and "Greymatter" Context

Apple’s internal AI development, codenamed Ajax and Project Greymatter ¹³, serves as the foundational layer that orchestrates this hybrid system. Greymatter: Refers to the suite of AI tools integrated into the OS (iOS 18/macOS Sequoia), such as notification summarization and smart replies. In Creator Studio, this technology likely powers the Transcript Search and Smart Auto-Crop features. Ajax: The internal framework (likely based on JAX) used to build and fine-tune the on-device models. This ensures that the small, efficient models running on the Neural Engine are highly optimized for the specific tasks of creative assembly.

Chapter 5: The New Creator Economics – Freeing Budgets for Emerging AI

The crux of the argument for Creator Studio is financial. In the "Great AI Shakeout," the cost of being a competitive creator has shifted. The budget that once went to NLEs and plugins must now be reallocated to high-end generative tools. Apple’s low-cost utility layer is the mechanism that makes this reallocation possible.

5.1 Analysis of Emerging High-Cost AI Tools

To understand the "budget liberation" effect, we must examine the costs of the tools that Apple is effectively subsidizing by lowering the cost of the core stack.

5.1.1 Mosaic AI: The Visual Ideation Engine

Mosaic AI ² represents the new frontier of Visual Understanding and Generative Ideation. Functionality: It offers an "Infinite, Interactive Canvas" that uses models like Gemini 2.5 Pro and Veo3 to perform complex visual analysis, storyboarding, and shot sequencing. It can scan video clips for thematic elements ("Golden Hour Sunset") and structure narratives. Cost Implication: High-end visual intelligence tools like this are typically priced for enterprise or prosumer tiers (USD 30-60/month). They provide the "Brain" of the operation—understanding and generating ideas—which Apple’s tools (the "Hands") then execute. Necessity: For a modern filmmaker, a tool that can "watch" raw footage and organize it semantically is a massive time-saver, justifying the high cost.

5.1.2 ElevenLabs: The Neural Voice Standard

ElevenLabs ³ dominates the AI voice market with its hyper-realistic text-to-speech and dubbing. Pricing Reality: While there is a cheap "Starter" plan (USD 5), professional work requires the Creator (USD 22/mo) or Pro (USD 99/mo) plans. Pro Plan Necessity: The Pro plan offers 500,000 credits (approx. 10 hours of audio), 192kbps audio quality (essential for broadcast), and commercial rights. The Cost Barrier: For an indie creator, adding a USD 99/month voice subscription is impossible if they are already paying USD 60/month for Adobe Creative Cloud.

5.1.3 Runway Gen-3: The Generative Video Factory

Runway ⁴ is the leader in text-to-video generation. Pricing: The "Unlimited" plan, which is necessary for serious iteration (avoiding credit rationing), costs USD 95/user/month (USD 76 if billed annually). The Squeeze: A creator needing both ElevenLabs Pro and Runway Unlimited faces nearly USD 200/month in AI costs alone.

5.2 The Arbitrage Model

Apple’s strategy creates a financial arbitrage opportunity for the creator. Table 1: The "Old Stack" vs. "Apple Utility Stack" Cost Breakdown (Monthly)

5.3 Strategic Implication: The "Pro" Definition Shift

This shift redefines what it means to be a "Pro." Old Definition: A Pro is someone who pays for expensive tools (Avid, Premiere). New Definition: A Pro is someone who pays for expensive generative capacity (ElevenLabs, Runway).
Apple aligns itself with the future by making the tools cheap so the pro can afford the capacity. This creates a symbiotic relationship: ElevenLabs and Mosaic AI thrive because Apple users have the liquidity to subscribe to them.

Chapter 6: Impact on the Competitive Landscape

Apple’s move places immense pressure on incumbent software vendors, particularly Adobe and Blackmagic Design (DaVinci Resolve).

6.1 Adobe’s "Innovator’s Dilemma"

Adobe is trapped in a classic Innovator’s Dilemma. Its revenue is dependent on high-margin subscriptions for its core creative apps. It cannot lower the price of Premiere Pro to USD 13 without devastating its stock price. The Firefly Defense: Adobe attempts to justify its pricing by integrating its own generative AI (Firefly).¹⁴ However, Firefly runs in the cloud, increasing Adobe’s operating costs. The Vulnerability: If creators perceive Apple’s "good enough" AI (Magnetic Mask, Montage Maker) plus external "best-in-class" AI (Midjourney, ElevenLabs) as superior to Adobe’s "all-in-one" walled garden, Adobe loses the prosumer market.

6.2 The DaVinci Resolve Factor

Blackmagic Design’s DaVinci Resolve has long played the "low cost" game (free version, USD 295 one-time studio version). Apple’s Advantage: While Resolve is a powerful NLE, it lacks the ecosystem integration (Logic Pro, Pixelmator) and the mobile parity (iPad apps) that Apple offers. Apple’s bundle attacks Resolve by offering a broader suite of tools for a similar low cost of entry, backed by the hardware synergy of the M-series chips.

6.3 The "Moat" of the Ecosystem

Apple’s ultimate moat is not the software itself, but the workflow friction it removes. By controlling the hardware, OS, and Utility Layer software, Apple creates a workflow that is simply faster than a Windows/Adobe workflow. AirDrop Integration: Shooting on iPhone, AirDropping to iPad FCP, editing with Apple Pencil, finishing on Mac Studio. No competitor can match this hardware-software fluidity. iCloud Sync: Collaborative workflows ¹⁵ built on iCloud allow teams to share project files seamlessly. While Adobe has Frame.io (a strong competitor), Apple’s integration is native to the file system.

Chapter 7: Future Outlook and Strategic Implications

7.1 The OS for AI

Looking forward to 2027-2030, Apple’s strategy positions it to be the "Operating System for AI." By refusing to build a walled garden around generative models (allowing Mosaic, ElevenLabs, etc. to flourish alongside its tools), Apple becomes the neutral platform where all AI innovation converges.

7.2 Hardware Upsell as the Revenue Driver

The long-term revenue play for Apple is not the USD 13/month subscription, but the hardware upgrades it necessitates. The Upgrade Cycle: As AI models (even on-device ones) become more complex, the demand for Neural Engine performance increases. The creator who relies on "Magnetic Mask" to save 5 hours a week will be the first to upgrade to the M6 or M7 chip to make it run faster. The "Pro" iPad: The existence of FCP and Logic on iPad justifies the existence of the iPad Pro as a true professional machine, driving sales of high-margin tablets and accessories (Magic Keyboard, Apple Pencil Pro).

7.3 Conclusion

The Apple Creator Studio is a masterclass in strategic adaptation. In the face of the "Great AI Shakeout," Apple has correctly identified that the value of standalone creative software is plummeting while the cost of generative intelligence is rising. By bundling its professional applications into a low-cost, high-efficiency utility layer, Apple provides the stability that creators crave. It leverages AI-driven efficiency to commoditize tedious tasks. It leverages Gemini integration to provide world-class intelligence without high capital costs. It breaks down internal silos to mirror the multimodal nature of modern content. Most importantly, it frees creator budgets, empowering the next generation of artists to afford the generative tools that define the future. In doing so, Apple secures its position not merely as a toolmaker, but as the essential infrastructure of the AI creative age. References

1. Introducing Apple Creator Studio, an inspiring collection of creative ..., accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/01/introducing-apple-creator-studio-an-inspiring-collection-of-creative-apps/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

2. Product - AI Video Editing Platform | Mosaic, accessed January 14, 2026, https://mosaic.so/product ↩ ↩2

3. ElevenLabs Pricing for Creators & Businesses of All Sizes, accessed January 14, 2026, https://elevenlabs.io/pricing ↩ ↩2

4. AI Image and Video Pricing from $12/month|RunwayAI,accessedJanuary14,2026,https://runwayml.com/pricing{[}^8]:AICouldSpellTroubleforSoftware.TheseExpertsSaytoAvoidOneStockInParticular,accessedJanuary14,2026,https://www.investopedia.com/ai-could-spell-trouble-for-software-these-experts-say-to-avoid-one-stock-in-particular-adbe-11884903{[}^9]:Adobe(ADBE)IsDown7.8{[}^{1}0]:Appl{e}^{\prime }s$13/month Creator Studio: Pro Editing Tools That Crush $680 in Upfront Costs - Launching Jan 28! - Gadget Review, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.gadgetreview.com/apples-13-month-creator-studio-pro-editing-tools-that-crush-680-in-upfront-costs-launching-jan-28 ↩ ↩2

5. Final Cut Pro - Apple, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.apple.com/final-cut-pro/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3

6. Use iCloud with your Mac Studio - Apple Support, accessed January 14, 2026, https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-studio/use-icloud-with-your-mac-apdc44eb8957/mac ↩

7. Buy Pro Apps Bundle for Education - Apple, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.apple.com/ca-edu/shop/product/bmge2z/a/pro-apps-bundle-for-education ↩

8. Responsive Design in SwiftUI: One Codebase for iPhone, iPad, and Mac | by Commit Studio, accessed January 14, 2026, https://commitstudiogs.medium.com/responsive-design-in-swiftui-one-codebase-for-iphone-ipad-and-mac-ee62c95b6efa ↩

9. Pixelmator Pro - Apple, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.apple.com/pixelmator-pro/ ↩

10. Final Cut Pro for Mac - Technical Specifications - Apple, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.apple.com/final-cut-pro/specs/ ↩

11. Apple picks Google Gemini to power AI Siri and next-gen Apple Intelligence features, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/apple-picks-google-gemini-to-power-ai-siri-and-next-gen-apple-intelligence-features-2851012-2026-01-13 ↩ ↩2

12. Gemini-trained Apple Intelligence will work like other LLMs, says unsurprising report, accessed January 14, 2026, https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/01/14/gemini-trained-apple-intelligence-will-work-like-other-llms-says-unsurprising-report ↩

13. Apple's Foray into AI with Project “Ajax” and Apple GPT | doing the math for you - gekko, accessed January 14, 2026, https://gpt.gekko.de/project-ajax-and-apple-gpt/ ↩

14. Adobe Firefly's New AI Editing Tools Are a Step Toward More Precise AI Video - CNET, accessed January 14, 2026, https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/adobe-fireflys-news-ai-editing-tools-video-editor-prompting/ ↩

15. Collaborate on projects with Messages on iPhone - Apple Support, accessed January 14, 2026, https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/collaborate-on-projects-iphf08c82a16/ios ↩