UBI is Unattainable - UBA is the Solution: The Macroeconomic Case for Bitcoin as the Vehicle for Sovereign Wealth in the Global South

1. Introduction: The Crisis of Development Economics and the False Promise of Income

The central progressive narrative of the 21st century regarding poverty alleviation has coalesced around the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI). The proposition is seductively simple: the state should guarantee a minimum income floor for every citizen, unconditional and periodic, to shield them from the vagaries of market volatility and the impending displacement of automation. While this model has garnered significant academic and political support in the post-industrial economies of the West, its application to the Global South—specifically the high-poverty, low-fiscal-capacity nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America—presents a dangerous mirage.

The core thesis of this report posits that UBI is structurally unattainable for the developing world due to insurmountable fiscal constraints, the inevitability of inflationary feedback loops, and the resultant erosion of currency sovereignty. The "handouts" of the COVID-19 era served as a global stress test for demand-side stimulus in supply-constrained economies, demonstrating empirically that when liquidity is injected without a corresponding increase in production or asset accumulation, the resulting inflation acts as a regressive tax that cripples the poor faster than assistance cheques can arrive. [1]

If UBI is a fleeting dream, the solution must lie in a fundamental reimagining of economic empowerment. The trap that ensnares the "plebs" and the extreme poor is not merely a lack of income flow, but a systemic inability to convert labor into lasting assets. The poor are locked out of the asset economy by four structural walls: exclusionary Know-Your-Customer (KYC) regulations, prohibitive minimum investment thresholds, predatory transaction costs, and a lack of liquidity. [3]

This analysis introduces Universal Basic Assets (UBA) as the superior alternative, with Bitcoin serving as the technological vector for its implementation. Unlike UBI, which redistributes depreciating fiat currency, UBA via Bitcoin enables the permissionless accumulation of a hard, deflationary asset. By bypassing the traditional banking cartels and leveraging the Lightning Network for near-zero cost transactions, Bitcoin allows the Global South to convert human energy directly into sovereign wealth. The objective is not to cripple the developing world with dependency on state largesse, but to enable the poor to opt out of broken monetary systems and accumulate capital that compounds over time.

2. The Macroeconomic Mirage: Why UBI Fails in the Global South

The transposition of UBI from the theoretical frameworks of the OECD to the fiscal realities of the Global South ignores the "Fiscal Impossibility Theorem." Developing nations do not possess the "exorbitant privilege" of printing a global reserve currency, nor do they have the broad tax bases required to fund universal transfers without precipitating a sovereign debt crisis.

2.1 The Fiscal Impossibility of Universal Transfers

To understand the unattainability of UBI, one must examine the budgetary arithmetic of nations like India and South Africa. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and local economic surveys have repeatedly highlighted that providing a "meaningful" basic income—defined even conservatively as a fraction of the poverty line—would require a complete dismantling of existing social infrastructure. [6]

In the Indian context, proposals for a UBI of approximately ₹10,000 (Indian Rupees) per year have been floated. While seemingly modest, extending this to a population of 1.4 billion would consume a catastrophic percentage of GDP. To fund this without exploding the fiscal deficit, the state would be forced to scrap critical public distribution systems (PDS) for food, fertilizer, and energy subsidies. [7] This creates a zero-sum game where the poor are stripped of guaranteed caloric security in exchange for a cash transfer that is immediately eroded by market volatility. The "fiscal space" simply does not exist. As noted in IMF analyses, replacing the PDS with UBI results in net losses for many low-income households, particularly when the logistical cost of cash distribution in under-banked regions is factored in. [7]

Similarly, in South Africa, debates surrounding the transformation of the COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress grant into a permanent UBI revealed that financing such a scheme would require tax hikes of up to 25%. [8] For an emerging economy struggling with stagnant growth and high unemployment, such a contractionary fiscal policy would suffocate the private sector, reducing the overall economic pie in an attempt to slice it more evenly. The fiscal feasibility analysis concludes that a budget-neutral UBI in the Global South yields a transfer value so low it fails to alleviate poverty, while a sufficient UBI requires borrowing that leads inevitably to default. [9]

2.2 The Inflationary Feedback Loop: Lessons from the COVID Era

The most pernicious argument against UBI in supply-constrained economies is inflation. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a natural experiment in what happens when governments inject massive liquidity into an economy suffering from production bottlenecks. The results were unequivocal: inflation hits the poor hardest. [1]

In developed nations, stimulus checks were absorbed partly by asset markets. In the Global South, where the marginal propensity to consume is near 100%, stimulus translates directly into demand for essential goods (food and fuel). Because local production capacities are rigid due to infrastructure deficits, this demand shock results in "agflation" (agricultural inflation).

Table 1: The Inflationary Impact Mechanism of Fiat UBI in Developing Economies

Research indicates that pandemic-induced income shocks, coupled with inflationary pressure, pushed approximately 150 million people back into extreme poverty. [10] In Nigeria and Argentina, the "stimulus" effect was rapidly negated by currency devaluation. In Argentina, where inflation has exceeded 200%, a fixed-sum UBI becomes worthless within months unless it is indexed to inflation—a mechanism that would then trigger hyperinflation. [11] The handouts of the COVID era demonstrated that the speed of assistance cheques cannot outpace the velocity of money in a failing fiat system.

2.3 Dependency and the Political Economy of Handouts

Beyond the mathematics, UBI creates a malign political dynamic. It centralizes economic survival in the hands of the state. In nations with weak institutions and histories of clientelism, UBI becomes a mechanism for political control rather than liberation. It fosters a dependency culture where the citizenry looks to the government for subsistence rather than to the market for opportunity. [12]

Critics of the welfare state argue that if you take dollars targeted at the poor and dilute them into universal payments, you often redistribute income upward. [13] The "universal" aspect implies that scarce resources are wasted on those who do not need them, while the "income" aspect traps the poor in a cycle of consumption without accumulation. The poor do not need a stipend to survive in poverty; they need a vehicle to escape it. This requires assets, not just income.

3. Economic Apartheid: The Structural Barriers to Asset Accumulation

If UBI is a dead end, the alternative must be wealth creation. However, the global financial system is engineered to prevent the "plebs"—the working poor—from converting their labor into capital. The problem is not that the poor do not work; it is that their labor is remunerated in melting fiat currency, and they are structurally barred from moving that value into hard assets. This phenomenon can be described as Economic Apartheid, enforced by four specific barriers.

3.1 Barrier 1: The Identity Wall (KYC/AML)

The most formidable barrier is the global regulatory framework of "Know Your Customer" (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML). While ostensibly designed to combat illicit finance, these regulations effectively act as a blockade against the poor.

In rural Africa, India, and Southeast Asia, hundreds of millions of people lack the formal documentation—birth certificates, government IDs, utility bills in their name—required to open a bank account. [3] Without a bank account, access to the asset economy is impossible. One cannot open a brokerage account, buy government bonds, or invest in real estate without navigating a labyrinth of identity verification.

This exclusion forces the poor to operate entirely in cash (or informal systems). Cash in the Global South is a liability; it is subject to theft, physical degradation, and, most importantly, inflation. The "Identity Wall" ensures that the poor remain unbanked and, consequently, asset-less. Even when accounts are available, risk-based approaches often categorize low-income individuals as "high risk," leading to account closures or restrictions. [4]

3.2 Barrier 2: The Minimum Investment Threshold

Even if the identity barrier is surmounted, the poor face the barrier of indivisibility. Traditional assets are lumpy.

• Real Estate: The primary vehicle for middle-class wealth preservation globally is real estate. However, one cannot buy 10 USD worth of land. The minimum capital requirement for entry is in the thousands of dollars, effectively excluding the bottom 50% of the global population.
• Gold: While culturally significant in India and Africa, buying gold in small quantities is economically inefficient. Small denominations (e.g., 1 gram) carry massive premiums ("making charges") that can exceed 15-20% of the spot price. [5]
• Equities: Stock markets often require minimum trade sizes or charge flat brokerage fees that destroy the returns on small investments.

This "minimum threshold" creates a trap where the poor can only save in cash, while the rich can allocate capital to assets that compound.

3.3 Barrier 3: Predatory Transaction Costs

The cost of moving value in the Global South is punitively high. Real estate transactions incur stamp duties, legal fees, and registration costs that can total 6-10% of the property value. [14]

More critically, the cost of remittances—often the primary source of capital for poor families—is exorbitant. Sub-Saharan Africa remains the most expensive region in the world to send money to, with average fees hovering around 8-10% for transfers under 200 USD. [15] This is a direct tax on the labor of the poor. When a migrant worker sends funds home to build a house or start a business, the financial system extracts a tithe that significantly retards asset accumulation.

3.4 Barrier 4: Liquidity Constraints

For the poor, liquidity is not a luxury; it is survival. A laborer in Nairobi cannot afford to lock their meager savings into an illiquid asset like land or a 5-year bond because they are exposed to high volatility in their daily lives (medical emergencies, crop failures, job loss).

Traditional assets are illiquid. Selling land takes months. Selling physical gold requires finding a buyer and often accepting a "distress price." The poor pay a liquidity premium—they are forced to keep their wealth in cash (which loses value) because they cannot afford the time-cost of liquidating hard assets. They need an asset that serves as a long-term store of value but is instantly liquid, 24/7, without an intermediary's permission. Until the advent of digital assets, such a vehicle did not exist.

4. The Solution: Universal Basic Assets (UBA) via Bitcoin

The failure of UBI and the existence of these structural barriers necessitate a pivot to Universal Basic Assets (UBA). While some institutional definitions of UBA focus on state-managed resources or shared commons [16], the most potent interpretation for the Global South is sovereign private accumulation.

The thesis of Bitcoin as UBA is straightforward: If you provide the poor with a permissionless, divisible, and liquid hard asset, they will bypass the broken fiat system and accumulate wealth automatically. Bitcoin transforms the "labor-to-asset" conversion rate from negative (due to inflation/fees) to positive (due to deflation/scarcity).

4.1 Bitcoin as the Perfect UBA: Technical Properties

Bitcoin possesses specific monetary properties that directly address the four barriers identified above:

1. Permissionless (Solving KYC): Bitcoin is an open protocol. A wallet address is simply a cryptographic public key. Generating one requires no government ID, no utility bill, and no permission from a bank manager. A refugee with a smartphone can generate a Bitcoin wallet in seconds. This dismantles the Identity Wall. [17]
2. Divisibility (Solving Thresholds): Bitcoin is divisible to eight decimal places. One Bitcoin consists of 100,000,000 satoshis. This means a user can buy, earn, or save 0.50 USD worth of Bitcoin. There is no minimum investment threshold. A daily wage earner can convert surplus labor into the hardest asset on earth, 100 satoshis at a time. [18]
3. Low Transaction Costs (Solving Fees): Through the Lightning Network (a Layer 2 scaling solution), Bitcoin transactions can be sent instantly for fractions of a penny. This eliminates the 10% tax on remittances and commerce. [15]
4. Liquidity (Solving Volatility): Bitcoin trades 24/7/365 on a global market. It can be converted to purchasing power instantly, anywhere in the world. It offers the scarcity of gold with the velocity of cash.

Table 2: Bitcoin vs. Traditional Assets for the Global Poor

4.2 The "Labor-to-Asset" Conversion Thesis

The core economic problem for the "plebs" is that they sell their labor for a currency that creates a leakage of value. In Nigeria, holding Naira means losing 30-60% of one's labor value annually to inflation. [19]

Bitcoin fixes the Labor-to-Asset conversion. When a worker gets paid in Bitcoin (or converts immediately), they stop the leakage. They move their labor energy into a thermodynamic vault that cannot be debased by political decree. This creates a "personal sovereign wealth fund." Over time, as the adoption of the network grows and the supply remains fixed (21 million), the purchasing power of the asset tends to increase (deflationary money). This allows the poor to benefit from the natural deflationary pressures of technology, rather than suffering from the inflationary pressures of fiat. [20]

5. Mechanisms of Empowerment: How UBA Works in Practice

The transition to UBA is not a theoretical proposal for future legislation; it is an active economic shift occurring on the ground in the Global South. Three specific mechanisms are driving this adoption: the Lightning Network, Microwork platforms, and decentralized mining.

5.1 The Lightning Network: The Rail for Global Economic Inclusion

The Lightning Network (LN) is the technological breakthrough that makes Bitcoin viable as a UBA for the poor. By creating off-chain payment channels, LN allows for unlimited transactions to occur instantly without burdening the main blockchain.

Impact on Remittances: Remittances are the lifeblood of many developing economies. Traditional rails (SWIFT, Western Union) are slow and expensive. LN enables "streaming remittances." A migrant worker in El Salvador can receive funds from a relative in the US instantly with near-zero fees. [15] This 8-10% saving is not trivial; for a family living on the margins, it represents a significant increase in disposable income—effectively a "raise" generated by efficiency rather than subsidy.

Impact on Commerce: Merchants in the Global South, often excluded from credit card networks due to high fees and hardware costs, can accept Bitcoin over Lightning using nothing but a smartphone. This integrates the informal economy into a global digital payment standard without the need for a bank intermediary. [21]

5.2 Microwork and "Streaming Money": Earning in Hard Assets

The combination of Bitcoin and the internet has birthed a new labor market: Microwork. Platforms like Stakwork, Remotasks, and Bitwage allow users in the Global South to perform digital tasks—labeling images for AI, transcribing audio, verifying data—and get paid instantly in Bitcoin. [22]

This is the direct application of the "Labor-to-Asset" thesis. A student in Kenya or a stay-at-home mother in India can work for 15 minutes, earn 1,000 satoshis, and have that asset settled immediately in their wallet. They do not need to wait for a bi-weekly paycheck or pay a bank transfer fee.

• Bitwage: Allows freelancers to bypass local banking restrictions and receive a percentage of their salary in Bitcoin/Stablecoins. This is crucial in countries like Argentina where official exchange rates are manipulated by the government to tax exports. [24]
• Stakwork: A task marketplace that pays via Lightning. It provides a "floor" for labor value, accessible to anyone with an internet connection, effectively creating a market-based basic income that is earned, not given. [23]

5.3 Mining as Rural Development and Community Asset

Bitcoin mining is often mischaracterized as wasteful, but in the Global South, it is emerging as a tool for rural electrification and community asset generation.

Gridless Compute (Africa): In rural East Africa, companies like Gridless are using Bitcoin mining to monetize "stranded" renewable energy. Small hydro-power plants often produce more electricity than the local village can consume (especially at night). Without a battery or a connection to the national grid, this energy is wasted. Bitcoin miners buy this excess energy, providing a revenue stream that makes the hydro plant financially viable and subsidizes lower electricity rates for the village. [25]

The Bhutan Model: The Kingdom of Bhutan has quietly become a major Bitcoin miner, using its abundant hydroelectric resources to accumulate a national treasury of digital assets. [26] This is State-Level UBA. Instead of taxing its citizens or borrowing from the World Bank, Bhutan is converting its natural resource (water) directly into a global reserve asset. This sovereign accumulation provides a buffer against economic shocks and funds national development without debt.

6. Regional Case Studies: The UBA Revolution in Action

The adoption of Bitcoin as a Universal Basic Asset is not uniform; it varies based on the specific economic pain points of each region. The data from Nigeria, Latin America, and El Salvador reveals distinct patterns of "sovereign adoption."

6.1 Nigeria: The Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Resistance

Nigeria represents the vanguard of the UBA thesis. Despite a hostile regulatory environment where the Central Bank banned financial institutions from servicing crypto exchanges, Nigeria has one of the highest crypto adoption rates in the world. [19]

The driving force is the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) market. Nigerians utilize platforms like Noones and local Telegram groups to trade Bitcoin directly for Naira or goods.

• Motivation: The Naira has suffered catastrophic devaluation. Nigerians use Bitcoin not for speculation, but as a hedge to preserve savings. 67% of Nigerian users identify as "savers" or "investors" looking to escape inflation. [19]
• Mechanism: The P2P market operates as a decentralized shadow economy that the state cannot shut down. It allows citizens to access the global economy and bypass the capital controls intended to trap their wealth within the failing local system. [17]

6.2 Latin America & Turkey: The Inflation Hedge

In high-inflation economies like Argentina (200%+ inflation) and Turkey (50%+), Bitcoin and stablecoins function as the de facto UBA.

• Argentina: With strict capital controls limiting the purchase of US Dollars (the "Cepo"), Argentines turn to crypto assets. Stablecoins and Bitcoin are used for everything from real estate transactions to daily savings. The adoption is driven by the need for "financial self-defense" against the state's monetary malpractice. [11]
• Turkey: The Lira's collapse has driven millions into digital assets. Bitcoin is viewed as "digital gold"—a store of value that, unlike physical gold, can be transported across borders instantly on a phone. [28]

6.3 El Salvador: The State-Sponsored UBA

El Salvador is the first nation to attempt to institutionalize Bitcoin as a UBA. By making Bitcoin legal tender, the government aimed to:

1. Bank the Unbanked: 70% of the population had no bank account. The Chivo wallet provided immediate access to digital financial rails. [29]
2. Capture Remittances: Reducing the cost of money sent from the diaspora in the US.
3. Attract Investment: Positioning the country as a hub for the digital economy.

While the rollout faced technical challenges, the underlying logic—shifting the national economic base from a dependency on USD/IMF debt to a sovereign asset standard—remains a pioneering experiment in development economics. [30]

7. Analysis: Deflationary Economics and the End of the Inflation Tax

The shift to UBA via Bitcoin has profound implications for the distribution of wealth. In a fiat system, the government has the power to dilute the currency supply. This "Cantillon Effect" benefits those closest to the money printer (banks, large corporations) at the expense of those furthest away (the poor, wage laborers). Inflation is a regressive tax that systematically strips wealth from the holders of cash. [2]

Bitcoin reverses this. It is a deflationary system (or disinflationary, with a hard cap). As productivity increases due to technology (AI, robotics), the cost of goods should fall. In a fiat system, central banks print money to fight this "bad" deflation, keeping prices stable or rising. In a Bitcoin standard, the purchasing power of the currency increases as prices fall.

For the poor holding Bitcoin as a UBA, this means their savings effectively "work" for them. They capture the deflationary dividend of technological progress. This is the ultimate "sustainable income"—not a handout from the state, but a currency that appreciates in real terms, rewarding saving and prudent capital allocation.

Table 3: The Economic Paradigm Shift

8. Conclusion: Enabling the Poor, Not Crippling Them

The debate between UBI and UBA is a debate between two visions of the future for the Global South. One vision sees the poor as helpless victims of global capitalism who must be sustained by a permanent drip-feed of state-provided cash—a cash that is perpetually debased by the very governments issuing it. This path leads to fiscal ruin, hyperinflation, and a permanent underclass dependent on political patronage.

The alternative vision, Universal Basic Assets, recognizes the poor as latent capitalists who are currently restrained by the structural chains of the legacy financial system. By removing the barriers of identity, threshold, and cost, Bitcoin enables the Global South to access the same tools of wealth preservation used by the global elite.

The evidence from the research is clear:

1. UBI is Fiscally Impossible: Developing nations cannot afford it without triggering inflationary spirals that hurt the poor. [1]
2. Barriers are Structural: The poor stay poor because they cannot save in hard assets due to KYC and fees. [3]
3. Bitcoin Works: It is already serving as a life-raft in Nigeria, Turkey, and Argentina. [11]
4. Technology is the Enabler: Lightning and microwork platforms are turning "Labor-to-Asset" conversion into a reality. [23]

The point, as the thesis states, is to enable the poor, not cripple them with handouts. Bitcoin provides the infrastructure for self-sovereignty. It allows a farmer in Africa to be his own bank, a freelancer in India to be her own settlement network, and a community in El Salvador to be its own utility company. In a world where fiat currency is a melting ice cube, Bitcoin is the ark. For the Global South, UBA is not just a policy proposal; it is the only viable path to genuine economic liberation.

Works Cited

1. Mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equity - PubMed Central, accessed January 19, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10234832/

2. Universal Basic Income – Tried, Tested and Failed as Expected | Investing.com NG, accessed January 19, 2026, https://ng.investing.com/analysis/%C2%BFcu%C3%A1nto-cost%C3%B3-el-mundial-brasil-2014-206297

3. Action 1 | Digital Finance Inclusion, accessed January 19, 2026, https://digitalfinance.worldbank.org/topics/gender/action-1

4. Understanding Barriers to Financial Access: Insights from Bank Pricing Data in, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2024/150/article-A001-en.xml

5. Gold Vs Cryptocurrency: Which Is The Better Bet For Indian Investors? - Grip Invest, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.gripinvest.in/blog/gold-vs-cryptocurrency

6. India: Universal Basic Income Proposals 1 - IMF eLibrary, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2017/055/article-A004-en.xml

7. Universal Basic Income in Developing Countries: Issues, Options, and Illustration for India in, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2018/174/article-A001-en.xml

8. Universal Basic Income: How the experience in developing countries can inform the discussion in South Africa, accessed January 19, 2026, https://econrsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Jessica-Gagete-Miranda-How-the-experience-in-developing-countries-can-inform-the-discussion-in-South-Africa.pdf

9. Universal Basic Income Programs: How Much Would Taxes Need to Rise? Evidence for Brazil, Chile, India, Russia, and South Africa - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed January 19, 2026, https://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/2108.html

10. Impacts of COVID‐19 on global poverty, food security, and diets - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed January 19, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8251321/

11. What Argentina, Nigeria, and Turkey Are Really Telling Us About the Future of Money | by Dave Sutter | OpenTrade | Medium, accessed January 19, 2026, https://medium.com/opentrade/what-argentina-nigeria-and-turkey-are-really-telling-us-about-the-future-of-money-8a2a250e133c

12. Universal Basic Incomes vs. Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries - NBER, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24939/w24939.pdf

13. Universal Basic Income (UBI) | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, & Income Equality | Britannica, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.britannica.com/procon/universal-basic-income-UBI-debate

14. Financial barriers to economic growth in low-income countries - GOV.UK, accessed January 19, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c44b08d40f0b6171c714f3c/RiC-Finance-politics-and-growth.pdf

15. Lightning Network Remittances: How Banks Can Cut Fees by 80% - Lightspark, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.lightspark.com/knowledge/lightning-network-remittances

16. Universal Basic Assets - Open Source Ecology, accessed January 19, 2026, https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Universal_Basic_Assets

17. No KYC Crypto Exchanges in India: Market Demand, Regulation, and Platform Landscape, accessed January 19, 2026, https://onekey.so/blog/ecosystem/no-kyc-crypto-exchanges-in-india-market-demand-regulation-and-platform-landscape/

18. Lightning Network: What It Is and How It Works - Investopedia, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lightning-network.asp

19. More Nigerians are investing in crypto; is the regulator right to be concerned about investor protection? - TechCabal, accessed January 19, 2026, https://techcabal.com/2025/10/28/nigerians-save-and-invest-with-crypto-should-regulation-follow/

20. The Infinity Economy: The Blueprint for a Post-Scarcity Civilization - ResearchGate, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393435392_The_Infinity_Economy_The_Blueprint_for_a_Post-Scarcity_Civilization

21. Merchants Who Accept Payments on Bitcoin Lightning Network - Webopedia, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.webopedia.com/crypto/learn/merchants-who-accept-payments-on-bitcoin-lightning-network/

22. Earn in USD doing online tasks from Africa - Remotasks, accessed January 19, 2026, https://site.remotasks.com/home/africa

23. Stakwork Pledges 180K USD To Fund Bitcoin Development, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/stakwork-pledges-180k-to-fund-bitcoin-developers/

24. Bitwage: Simplify Global Payroll & Workforce Payments, accessed January 19, 2026, https://bitwage.com/en-us

25. Could Bitcoin Mining Power Rural Africa?, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.forbesafrica.com/current-affairs/2025/09/25/could-bitcoin-mining-power-rural-africa

26. Bitcoin Mining as Electricity Arbitrage: An Energy and Infrastructure Strategy - CRF India, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.crfindia.org/publications/Issue-Brief/bitcoin-mining-as-electricity-arbitrage-an-energy-and-infrastructure-strategy

27. (PDF) Regulation of Peer-to-Peer Crypto Trading in Nigeria - ResearchGate, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388459045_Regulation_of_Peer-to-Peer_Crypto_Trading_in_Nigeria

28. Bitcoin Hits All-time High in Argentina, Turkey and Nigeria - BITmarkets, accessed January 19, 2026, https://bitmarkets.com/en/insights/article/bitcoin-hits-all-time-high-in-argentina-turkey-and-nigeria

29. BitcoinBeach.com - The First Bitcoin Circular Economy, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.bitcoinbeach.com/

30. Implications of Bitcoin in Developing Countries - University of Pennsylvania, accessed January 19, 2026, https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/77eda2bf-0c68-4c5e-8bae-f4cbc377c9ef/download

31. Get social with Bitcoin & Lightning - Strike, accessed January 19, 2026, https://strike.me/learn/better-social-media-with-bitcoin-lightning/

32. Best Apps to Sell Bitcoin in Nigeria: Platforms Nigerians Actually Use to Cash Out BTC, accessed January 19, 2026, https://westafricatradehub.com/crypto/best-apps-to-sell-bitcoin-in-nigeria/